R v Z
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 2009 |
| Year | 2009 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
13 cases
-
Sodiq Adeojo (1st Appellant) David Nyamupfukudza (2nd Appellant) v R
...they accept that evidence." 31 The judge did not refer in his ruling to the observations of the court in Z [2009] EWCA Crim 20, [2009] 1 Cr App R 34 (Stanley Burnton LJ, Gross and Royce JJ). There the prosecution wished to establish relevant bad character by adducing the evidence of a previ......
-
Jake Muldoon v R
...cases are infinitely various and will need to be considered on their own merits. As Burnton LJ stated in R v Z [200] EWCA Crim 20; [2009] 1 Cr App R 34 “ section 114(1)(d) should not be so narrowly applied that it has no effect” (see [20]). The present case demonstrates the need not to crea......
- R v Twist
-
R v John Anthony Burns and Another
...and Others [2008] 1 Cr App R 11, R v Y [2008] 1 Cr App R 34, R v Z [2009] 1 Cr App R 34, R v Thakrar [2010] EWCA (Crim) 1505, Sefton, and Riat. Having done so, we have come to the view that the matters raised by this application on this ground merit full argument on appeal and accordingly w......
Request a trial to view additional results
4 books & journal articles
-
The Safety-Valve: Discretion to Admit Hearsay Evidence in Criminal Proceedings
...3 All ER 1055 at [22].14 R v Taylor [2006] 2 Cr App R 14 at [38]–[40]; R vY[2008] EWCA Crim 10, [2008]1 Cr App R 34 at [56]; R vZ[2009] 1 Cr App R 34 at [21]; and see also R v Lamb[2006] EWCA Crim 3347 at [33].15 R vSadiq [2009] EWCA Crim 712 at [21]–[22].16 See Associated Provincial Pictur......
-
Human Trafficking, Victims’ Rights and Fair Trials
...100–1; Wendo vR(1963) 109 CLR 559.133. These are discussed in a forthcoming article by the first author and Natalie Wortley.134. RvZ[2009] 1 Cr App R 34; RvC[2010] EWCA Crim 2401, [2010] Crim LR 858; RvCT[2011] EWCA Crim 2341, [2012]Crim LR 217.135. RvBurton [2011] EWCA Crim 1990, [16].136.......
-
Hearsay, Bad Character and Trust in the Jury: Irish and English Contrasts
...For an example of a direction warning jurors about the frailties of hearsay evidence prior to thedecisions in Horncastle, see RvZ[2009] 1 Cr App R 34.100 J. R. Spencer, ‘Hearsay Evidence at Strasbourg: A Further Skirmish or the Final Round? AComment on Al-Khawaja and Tahery v UK in the Gran......
-
Book Review: Character Evidence in the Criminal Trial
...as examples of using ‘sure’: RvCrandle [2006] EWCA Crim 2663, RvLafayette [2008] EWCA Crim 3238, RvVickers[2012] EWCA Crim 2689, RvZ[2009] 1 Cr App R 34, RvSwellings [2009] 2 Cr App R (S) 30.174 The International Journal of Evidence & Proof...