R v Z
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) |
| Year | 2009 |
| Date | 2009 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
12 cases
-
Sodiq Adeojo (1st Appellant) David Nyamupfukudza (2nd Appellant) v R
...they accept that evidence." 31 The judge did not refer in his ruling to the observations of the court in Z [2009] EWCA Crim 20, [2009] 1 Cr App R 34 (Stanley Burnton LJ, Gross and Royce JJ). There the prosecution wished to establish relevant bad character by adducing the evidence of a previ......
-
Jake Muldoon v R
...cases are infinitely various and will need to be considered on their own merits. As Burnton LJ stated in R v Z [200] EWCA Crim 20; [2009] 1 Cr App R 34 “ section 114(1)(d) should not be so narrowly applied that it has no effect” (see [20]). The present case demonstrates the need not to crea......
-
Romano Mills v The Queen
...special measures for the protection of the witness, such as screens or video-transmitted evidence.” 13 Horncastle was followed in R v Riat [2013] 1 WLR 2592. Hughes LJ, as he then was, said at para 16 that the court should take all possible steps to enable a fearful witness to give evidenc......
- R v Twist
Get Started for Free
4 books & journal articles
-
The Safety-Valve: Discretion to Admit Hearsay Evidence in Criminal Proceedings
...3 All ER 1055 at [22].14 R v Taylor [2006] 2 Cr App R 14 at [38]–[40]; R vY[2008] EWCA Crim 10, [2008]1 Cr App R 34 at [56]; R vZ[2009] 1 Cr App R 34 at [21]; and see also R v Lamb[2006] EWCA Crim 3347 at [33].15 R vSadiq [2009] EWCA Crim 712 at [21]–[22].16 See Associated Provincial Pictur......
-
Human Trafficking, Victims’ Rights and Fair Trials
...100–1; Wendo vR(1963) 109 CLR 559.133. These are discussed in a forthcoming article by the first author and Natalie Wortley.134. RvZ[2009] 1 Cr App R 34; RvC[2010] EWCA Crim 2401, [2010] Crim LR 858; RvCT[2011] EWCA Crim 2341, [2012]Crim LR 217.135. RvBurton [2011] EWCA Crim 1990, [16].136.......
-
Hearsay, Bad Character and Trust in the Jury: Irish and English Contrasts
...For an example of a direction warning jurors about the frailties of hearsay evidence prior to thedecisions in Horncastle, see RvZ[2009] 1 Cr App R 34.100 J. R. Spencer, ‘Hearsay Evidence at Strasbourg: A Further Skirmish or the Final Round? AComment on Al-Khawaja and Tahery v UK in the Gran......
-
Book Review: Character Evidence in the Criminal Trial
...as examples of using ‘sure’: RvCrandle [2006] EWCA Crim 2663, RvLafayette [2008] EWCA Crim 3238, RvVickers[2012] EWCA Crim 2689, RvZ[2009] 1 Cr App R 34, RvSwellings [2009] 2 Cr App R (S) 30.174 The International Journal of Evidence & Proof...
