Racecourse Betting Control Board v Secretary for Air

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1944
CourtCourt of Appeal
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
46 cases
3 books & journal articles
  • THE EFFECTIVE REACH OF CHOICE OF LAW AGREEMENTS
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2008, December 2008
    • 1 December 2008
    ...Aspects of Prorogation and Arbitration Agreements”(1976) 25 ICLQ 543 at 556—557. 6 Racecourse Betting Control Board v Secretary for Air [1944] 1 Ch 114 (CA) at 126; The Fehmarn[1958] 1 WLR 159 (CA) at 161—162. 7 See E Peel, “Exclusive jurisdiction agreements: purity and pragmatism in the co......
  • THE CONTRACTUAL BASIS OF THE ENFORCEMENT OF EXCLUSIVE AND NON-EXCLUSIVE CHOICE OF COURT AGREEMENTS
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2005, December 2005
    • 1 December 2005
    ...1878, s 10. 61 Civil Law Act (Cap 43, 1999 Rev Ed), s 3(e). 62 Ibid s 3(f). 63 Eg, the International Arbitration Act, supra n 52. 64 [1944] Ch 114 at 126. See also The Fehmarn[1958] 1 WLR 159 at 163—164. 65 Donohue v Armco Inc [2002] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 425 at [24]; Ultisol Transport Contractors ......
  • STAY OF LITIGATION PENDING ARBITRATION
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 1994, December 1994
    • 1 December 1994
    ...jurisdiction in a matter that properly belongs to them”. 2 Mackinnon LJ in Racecourse Betting Control Board v Secretary of State for Air[1944] Ch 114. 3 The rules on choice of forum were less liberal than the rules on choice of arbitration which had a legislative basis. Law v Garrett(1878) ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT