Radio Corporation of America v Rauland Corporation (No 2)
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 1956 |
| Year | 1956 |
| Date | 1956 |
| Court | Queen's Bench Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
52 cases
-
Sabretech Inc. v Shannon Aerospace Ltd
...Eccles & Co. v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad CompanyELR [1912] 1 K.B. 135; Radio Corporation of America v. Rauland CorporationELR [1956] 1 Q.B. 618 and American Express Warehousing v. Doe and othersUNK [1967] 1 Lloyd's Rep. 222 followed. Sabretech Inc. v. Shannon Aerospace Ltd. In re an ......
-
Neal R Cutler, MD v Azur Pharma International III Ltd and Others
...Company v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company [1912] 1 K.B, 135 and Radio Corporation of America v. Rauland Corporation (No. 2) [1956] 1 Q.B. 618 and observed (at p. 471): "Accordingly, it appears to me that what I have to determine is whether the request in this case is in reality mer......
-
Re Norway's (State of) Application
...of the 1975 Act is established in Westinghouse and was equally so held by this court in relation to the 1856 Act in Radio Corporation of America v. Rauband Corporation (1956) 1 Q.B. 618. This is irrelevant in the present context, since the "evidence" is required for the trial itself. But "......
-
First American Corporation v Sheik Zayed Bin Sultan Al-Nahyan
...so held by this court in relation to the Foreign Tribunals Evidence Act 1856 in Radio Corporation of America -v- Ranland Corporation [1956] 1 QB 618. This is irrelevant in the present context, since the evidence is required for the trial itself. But fishing is, in my view, also relevant in ......
Request a trial to view additional results
4 books & journal articles
-
United Kingdom
...leading to a train of inquiry. The latter type of questioning would not [generally] 39 . Radio Corp. of Am. v. Rauland Corp. [1956] 1 All ER 549 (QB) (Eng.); Rio Tinto Zinc Corp. v. Westinghouse Electric Corp . [1978] AC 547 (HL) 608 (appeal taken from Eng.). 40 . In re State of Norway’s Ap......
-
Australia
...the Californian Code of Civil Procedure. Under that Code, such evidence “may be obtained and 18 . Radio Corp. of Am. v Rauland Corp. [1956] 1 QB 618, [1956] 1 All ER 549. 19 . Id. at 554; American Express Warehousing Ltd. v. Doe [1967] 1 Lloyd’s Rep. 222 at 266; Re Cochran Consulting Inc. v......
-
The role of damages in regulating horizontal price-fixing: comparing the situation in the United States, Europe and Australia.
...AC 58, 78. The broad nature of US discovery procedures was also the subject of discussion in Radio Corporation of America v Rauland [1956] 1 QB 618 and by the House of Lords in British Airways v Laker Airways [1985] AC (174) See Kroes, 'More Private Antitrust Enforcement through Better Acce......
-
Fishing for the smoking gun: the need for British courts to grant American style extraterritorial discovery requests in U.S. industry-wide tort actions.
...specific attention to U.S. policy in anti-trust legislation). (239.) Id. at 608 (quoting Radio Corp. of America v. Rauland Corp. [1956] 1 Q.B. 618, (240.) Id. at 610. (241.) See discussion supra Parts II.A., ll.B. (242.) Rio Tinto Zinc Corp., supra note 98, at 608. (243.) Id. (244.) See Col......