Rainham Chemical Works Ltd v Belvedere Fish Guano Company Ltd

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Year1920
Date1920
CourtCourt of Appeal
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
14 cases
  • Loh Bee Tuan v Shing Yin Construction (Kota Kinabalu) Sdn Bhd and Others
    • Malaysia
    • High Court (Malaysia)
    • January 1, 2002
  • Cambridge Water Company v Eastern Counties Leather
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • December 9, 1993
    ...principle, and plainly feared that they were being treated as scapegoats because they were making money out of the venture: see [1920] 2 K.B. 487, 521—523. The explosion at the factory appears to have originated in an ingredient used in the manufacture of the explosive, viz. dinitrophenol ......
  • Read v J. Lyons & Company Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • October 18, 1946
    ...explosives was a "non-natural" use of land. This was a case of damage to adjoining property: it is reported in the Court of Appeal in [1920] 2 K.B. 487 and in the Court of First Instance, where it was tried by Lord Justice Scrutton sitting as an additional Judge of the King's Bench Divisio......
  • Mca Records Inc. and and Another v Charly Records Ltd and Others
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • March 22, 2000
    ...This point was incidentally dealt with by the Court of Appeal in the recent case of Belvedere Fish Guano Co. v. Rainham Chemical Works [1920] 2 K.B 487". 11 The last two sentences of the citation also reflect, however, that it has long been established that if an employee of a company commi......
  • Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
  • TORTIOUS ACTS AND DIRECTORS
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2011, December 2011
    • December 1, 2011
    ...as the directors were still in occupation of the land. 21 [1893] AC 22. 22 Belvedere Fish Guano Co Ltd v Rainham Chemical Works LtdELR [1920] 2 KB 487 at 521–522. 23 [1924] 1 KB 1. 24 See also British Thomson-Houston Co Ltd v Stirling Accessories LtdELR[1924] 2 Ch 33 at 37–38 and 40 where T......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT