Ralli Brothers v Compania Naviera Sota y Aznar
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 26 March 1920 |
| Date | 26 March 1920 |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
121 cases
-
Dell Emerging Markets (Emea) Ltd v Systems Equipment
...the documents give rise to a sufficiently clear intention on the part of Dell France and SETS to terminate the 1991 IDA. Discussion: Ralli Bros principle 32 In Ralli Bros Spanish owners of a vessel sought to recover freight from the charterers in England notwithstanding that it exceeded t......
-
Peh Teck Quee v Bayerische Landesbank Girozentrale
...illegal at the place of performance. In support, he submitted a plethora of cases including Ralli Bros v Compania Naviera Sota y Aznar [1920] 2 KB 287, Overseas Union Bank Ltd v Chua Kok Kay & Anor [1993] 1 SLR 686 and Regazzoni v KC Sethia (1944) Ltd [1957] AC 301. He also contended that c......
- Shaikh Faisal trading as Gibca v Swan Hunter Singapore Pte Ltd
- Banco San Juan Internacional, Inc. v Petroleos De Venezuela SA
Get Started for Free
4 firm's commentaries
-
The Sandline Affair Illegality And International Law*
...of a foreign state could not so act without legislation, whereas mercenary forces could be authorised by an executive decision. 7.[1920] 2 King's Bench 287; see also R v International Trustee for the Protection of Bondholders AG [1937] Appeal Cases 500 per Lord Wright at 519; Regazzoni v KC......
-
Sanctions Risk: Drafting Contracts to Avoid ‘Double Jeopardy’
...under English law or under the law of the place where the contract is to be performed (Ralli Brothers v. Campania Naviera Sota Y Aznar [1920] 2 KB 287). Neither of those rules applied in this case. Cynergy was therefore potentially exposed to ‘double jeopardy’, the first well-known example ......
-
Sanctions Risk: Drafting Contracts To Avoid Double Jeopardy'
...under English law or under the law of the place where the contract is to be performed (Ralli Brothers v. Campania Naviera Sota Y Aznar [1920] 2 KB 287). Neither of those rules applied in this case. Cynergy was therefore potentially exposed to 'double jeopardy', the first well-known example ......
-
Dana Gas Sukuk: A red herring or cause for concern?
...(ii) performance of such obligation would be unlawful in the foreign jurisdiction (see, e.g. Ralli Bros v Compania Naviera Sota y Asnar [1920] 2 KB 287). In Dana Gas's circumstances, the onus should be on it to prove both that the Purchase Undertaking is to be performed in the UAE and that ......
13 books & journal articles
-
CONTRACTUAL ILLEGALITY AND CONFLICT OF LAWS
...of the operation of the rule in Foster v. Driscoll[1929] 1 K.B. 470 and the rule in Ralli Brothers v. Compania Naviera Sota y Aznar[1920] 2 K.B. 287. 14 Chapter 97, 1990 Edition. 15 See Amalgamated Steel Mills Bhd. v. Ingeback (Malaysia) Sdn. Bhd. [1990] 2 M.L.J. 374. 16 See Lloyd v. Guiber......
-
Table of cases
........................................................................................ 455 Ralli Bros. v. Compania Naviera Sota y Aznar, [1920] 2 K.B. 287 (C.A.) .......... 284 Ramsay v. Liverpool Royal Infirmary, [1930] A.C. 588 (H.L.) ............................ 16 Ramsay-Fairfax v. Rams......
-
Bank Account Operation
...it sufficient content to be a distinct qualification to Tournier . In England, 337 Ralli Brothers v. Compania Naviera Sota y Aznar , [1920] 2 K.B. 287 (C.A.). 338 For greater discussion, see Ogilvie, above note 71 at 680–84; Ellinger et al ., above note 174 at 159–66. 339 Above note 313 a......
-
Table of cases
...Bank plc, [1988] F.L.R. 1 (C.A.) .............................................. 286 Ralli Brothers v. Compania Naviera Sota y Aznar, [1920] 2 K.B. 287 (C.A.) .............................................................................. 330 Ramias v. Johnson, 2009 ABQB 386227 ....................
Get Started for Free