Ram v Lamley
Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
Judgment Date | 01 January 1682 |
Date | 01 January 1682 |
Court | Court of Common Pleas |
English Reports Citation: 123 E.R. 1139
THE COMMON PLEAS
kam versus lamley. Words. Spoken before a juat. peace. Norff. Bam brought an action upon the case again Lamley, and declared, that whereas he was bonus & legalis homo and free a suspitione felonite, the defendant maliciously went to the Major of Linn, and requested a warrant of him (being a justice of peace) against the plaintiff for stealing his ropes : the major said to him, Be advised and look what you do, the defendant said to the major, Sir, I will charge him with flat felony for stealing my ropes from my shop, quorum quidem verborum, &e. And after not guilty pleaded, and verdict for the plaintiff, Hitcham moved in arrest of judgment; and the Court unanimously resolved that these worda being spoken to the justice of peace when he came for his warrant, which was...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Kennedy v Hilliard (1859)
...1 Roll. Abr. 33. Cutler v. DixonENR 4 Co. Rep. 14 b. Hunter v. AllenENR Palmer 188. Aire v. SedgwickENR 2 Roll. Rep. 198. Ram v. LamleyENR Hut. 113. Aire v. SedgwickENR 2 Roll. Rep. 197. Maloney v. BartleyENR 3 Campb. 210. Trotman v. DunnENR 3 Campb. 211. Astley v. YoungENR 2 Burr. 807. Lak......
-
Baker v Pierce
...to determine them in the worst sense. As to say, he stole my timber out of my yard, or my hops in a bag. Hob. 331, Clerk vers. Gilbert. Hutton 113, Herbert v. Angett. So Hutton 38, Mason v. Thompson. I charge thee with felony for taking forth from J. D.'s pocket, and I will prove it; the wo......
-
Curry v Walter
...v. Sir R. Croft, Dy. 285 a. For the same reason an action will not lie for a false charge before a justice of the peace. Earn v. Lamley, Hut. 113, and per Cur. Cro. Jac. 432, or for a false charge in a plea. Ibid. So no action lies against a witness for a false charge. Harding v. Bodman, Hu......
-
Noell against Gray
...actionable (a), because it might be without a felonious intent. (But Holt, Chief Justice, condemned that authority.) Besides, he quoted Hutton, 113, "Thou art a thief, and hast couzened my cousin of his land," not actionable, though it was said, the subsequent words were accumulative, and t......