Rama Corporation Ltd v Proved Tin and General Investments Ltd

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtQueen's Bench Division
Year1952
Date1952

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
25 cases
1 firm's commentaries
  • Company agent authority - actual or ostensible?
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 8 April 2022
    ...entire contract. Estoppel under the doctrine of apparent or ostensible authority (Rama Corp Ltd v Proved Tin and General Investments Ltd [1952] 2 QB 147) . Specifically, when the company's encourages others to believe that an agency relationship exists, and the third party relies on that co......
15 books & journal articles
  • Chapter 2: Contract on a Bill
    • United Kingdom
    • Taylor and Francis Bills of Exchange and Bankers' Documentary Credits Bills of Exchange
    • Invalid date
    ...one which must be filed with the Registrar of Companies, and is not: see Companies Act 1985, s. 380(4). 85 Rama Corporation Ltd v. Proved Tin & General Investments Ltd [1952] 2 QB 147. Freeman & Lockyer v. Buckhurst Park Properties (Mangal) Ltd [1964] 2 QB 480, in particular see per Diplock......
  • Chapter 2: General Aspects of Lender Liability Under English Law
    • United Kingdom
    • Taylor and Francis Banks, Liability and Risk
    • Invalid date
    ...detrimental reliance, as against mere reliance? The authorities on this point are not clear. On the one hand, we have cases, such as, Rama Corp. v. Proved Tin and General Investments 27 and Freeman and Lockyer v. Buckhurst Park (Mangal) Properties Ltd, 28 which merely require that a transac......
  • Chapter 5. An Assessment of Sections 35–35b and 322a of The Companies Act 1985 and the Protection of Third Parties Dealing with Companies
    • United Kingdom
    • Taylor and Francis The Reform of United Kingdom Company Law Part 2. Contemporary Company Issues
    • Invalid date
    ...Cassel v Schenkers [1927] 1 KB 826; British Thomson- Houston v Federated European Bank [1932] 2 KB 176; Rama Corporation v Proved Tin & General Investments [1952] 2 QB 147. 82 See generally The Prentice Report, above n 83 See EEC/68/151. 84 See the Companies Act 1985, s 35A(2)(c). 85 See th......
  • Table of Cases
    • United Kingdom
    • Invalid date
    ...BTLC 35 11.16 Rafsanjan Pistachio Producers Cooperative v. Bank Leumi (UK) Ltd [1992] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 513 17.46 Rama Corp Ltd v. Proved Tin & General Investments Ltd [1952] 2 QB 147; [1952] 1 All ER 554; [1952] 1 TLR 709 2.23 Reckett v. Barnett [1929] AC 176 2.16 Redmond v. Allied Irish Bank ......
  • Get Started for Free