Rastin v British Steel

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
JudgeSir Thomas Bingham Mr,Beldam,Saville L JJ.
Judgment Date17 February 1994
CourtCourt of Appeal (Civil Division)
Date17 February 1994
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
59 cases
  • Williams v Globe Coaches (A Firm)
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 18 December 1995
    ...and for that purpose six test cases were assembled and heard together, now reported under the name of the first of the cases, Rastin v British Steel & Ors [1994] 1 WLR 732. That series of decisions achieved part, at least, of its purpose, in that certain of the questions which had given ris......
  • Re Order 17, Rule 11 of the County Court Rules; Bannister v S.G.B. Plc and Others and other Cases
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 25 April 1997
    ...the Rule does not apply to counterclaims. In any event we do not consider it is open to a court to make an order to which the principles (eg Rastin) on reinstatement apply, having regard to the existing authorities (eg Costellow) which are applied in cases that are not the subject of the au......
  • Reville v Wright
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 20 December 1996
    ...the Plaintiff's action. This particular appeal raises the question as to the correct application of the guideline cases commonly known as Rastin principles. 4 The background can be briefly stated. On 23 November 1990 there was a road traffic accident. The Plaintiff was driving his motor car......
  • Jackson v Slater Harrison & Company Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 20 December 1995
    ...support of those general propositions Mr. Hytner referred us to passages in the judgment where the judge expressly referred to the cases of Rastin and Hoskins; he warned us of the serious danger of this Court going back into the circumstances of a particular case. Accordingly we should not ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • AUTOMATIC DISCONTINUANCE UNDER ORDER 21 RULE 2 — FIRST DORMANT, THEN DEAD…
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2001, December 2001
    • 1 December 2001
    ...that an application to extend the year-long period can only be made before the year-long period is up. 37 [1997] 4 All ER 129. 38 [1994] 2 All ER 641. 39 [1993] 2 SLR 232. 40 [1997] 2 SLR 752. 41 A similar example was cited in Wee Siew Noi, supra, to illustrate conduct on the part of the de......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT