Ravenseft Properties Ltd v Davstone (Holdings) Ltd

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1978
Year1978
CourtQueen's Bench Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
41 cases
  • Kelang Pembena Kereta-Kereta Sdn Bhd v Mok Tai Dwan
    • Malaysia
    • Court of Appeal (Malaysia)
  • Quick v Taff Ely Borough Council
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • July 29, 1985
    ...(1940) 2 A.E.R. 434. His ultimate reasoning seems to me to be on the following lines viz:—(1) Recent authorities such as Ravenseft Properties v. Davstone (Holdings) Ltd. (1980) Q.B. 12 and Elmcroft Developments v. Tankersley-Sawyer (1984) 270 Estates Gazette 140 show that works of repair un......
  • Crédit Suisse v Beegas Nominees Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
  • Lee v Leeds City Council; Ratcliffe and Others v Sandwell Metropolitan Borough Council
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • January 21, 2002
    ...case on the basis of the authorities relating to cases where there was a repair requiring to be done, such as Ravenseft Properties Ltd v Davstone (Holdings) Ltd [1980] QB 12 and Elmcroft Developments Ltd v Tankesley-Sawyer (1984) 270 EG 140 that on a true construction of the covenant to rep......
  • Get Started for Free
1 firm's commentaries
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (May 3-7, 2021)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • May 10, 2021
    ...Inc. v. Tsai, 2003 BCSC 1336, Lurcott v. Wakely, [1911] 1 KB 905 (CA (Eng)), Ravenseft Properties Ltd. v. Davstone (Holdings) Ltd., [1980] QB 12 (QBD (Eng)), Morcom v. Campbell-Johnson, [1955] 3 WLR 497 (CA (Eng)), Brew Brothers Ltd. v. Snax (Ross) Ltd., [1970] 1 Q.B. 612 (C.A. (Eng.)), Nor......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT