Your World of Legal Intelligence
 United Kingdom | +44 (0) 20 7284 8080

RC v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions

Cited in 5 Precedent Map Related
JurisdictionUK Non-devolved
Neutral Citation[2009] UKUT 62 (AAC)
Date2009
Year2009
CourtUpper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
18 cases
  • RC CCS 1296 2008
    • United Kingdom
    • Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber)
    • 1 April 2009
    ...criteria. DECISION OF THE UPPER TRIBUNAL (ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS CHAMBER) (RC v Child Maintenance and Enforcement Commission (CSM) [2009] UKUT 62 (AAC)) This decision is given under section 11 of the Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007: The decision of the Bristol appeal tribunal und......
  • PB CCS 574 2012
    • United Kingdom
    • Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber)
    • 20 March 2013
    ...that this was a burden that was too onerous to place on [the father]. 26. The tribunal noted that in CCS/1296/2008 [RC v CMEC and WC [2009] UKUT 62 (AAC), reported as part of [2011] AACR 38, R (Cart) v Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber)], Lord Justice Carnworth and Upper [Tribu......
  • SJ CCS 2717 2013
    • United Kingdom
    • Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber)
    • 19 February 2014
    ...Agency’s submission to the second tribunal that the matter was “res judicata”. However, as the Upper Tribunal noted in RC v CMEC (CSM) [2009] UKUT 62 (AAC); [2011] AACR 38 (at [54]), “there is little room for a strict application of the rules of ‘issue estoppel’” in child support appeals, n......
  • R (on the Application of Cart) v Upper Tribunal [Sup Ct]
    • United Kingdom
    • Supreme Court
    • 22 June 2011
    ...now become) dismissed his appeal on the three grounds for which permission had been given and declined permission to reopen the fourth: [2009] UKUT 62 4 Mr Cart sought judicial review of the Upper Tribunal's refusal of permission to appeal on the fourth point. It was agreed that the amenabi......
    • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT