Re Asphaltic Wood Pavement Company

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtCourt of Appeal
Year1875

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
3 cases
  • Bumbak v Dalian Huarui Heavy Industry Group International Co Ltd, in the matter of Duro Felguera Australia Pty Limited (Subject to a Deed of Company Arrangement)
    • Australia
    • Federal Court (Australia)
    • 7 Julio 2023
    ...Ltd and Smith (2004) 209 ALR 694, Finkelstein J (at [15]) drew attention to observations of Cotton LJ in Re Asphaltic Wood Pavement Co (1885) 30 Ch D 216 concerning a claim based on work unperformed by a construction company at the date of its winding up. The company there under considerati......
  • The ‘STX Mumbai’
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 27 Junio 2014
    ...(1870) LR 9 Eq 725 (refd) Agra Bank, Re; Ex parte Tondeur (1867) LR 5 Eq 160 (refd) Asphaltic Wood Pavement Co, Re; Lee & Chapman's Case(1885) 30 Ch D 216 (distd) Brown Paper Mill Co v Irvin 146 F 2 d 232 (8th Cir, 1944) (refd) Chalmers, Ex parte; Re Edwards (1873) LR 8 Ch App 289 (refd) Fo......
  • The "STX Mumbai"
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 27 Junio 2014
    ...impossibility of performance leading to anticipatory breach. The first case is Re Asphaltic Wood Pavement Co, Lee and Chapman’s Case (1885) 30 Ch.D. 216.5 On the specific facts the court held that there was anticipatory breach by way of impossibility of performance because of the special fa......