Re Auld (Child: Temporary removal from jurisdiction)
Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
Judgment Date | 04 November 2004 |
Date | 04 November 2004 |
Court | Court of Appeal (Civil Division) |
COURT OF APPEAL
Before Lord Justice Thorpe, Lord Justice Wall and Lady Justice Black
Children - differing considerations applicable to temporary and permanent removal of child from jurisdiction
Considerations which applied to the temporary removal of a child from the jurisdiction were not the same as those which applied to permanent removal.
The Court of Appeal so held in allowing an appeal brought by the mother, Leanne Wilson, against the refusal by Judge Moir at Newcastle upon Tyne County Court, of her application to take her daughter, Abby, born on November 13, 2000, for a period not exceeding two years to South Africa so that the mother could undertake research for her PhD.
The application had been resisted by the child's father, Dean Auld. The parties had never been married but there was a parental responsibility order by consent.
Mr Roger McCarthy, QC, who did not appear below, for the mother; Ms Alison Ball, QC and Ms Pauline Moulder for the father.
LORD JUSTICE THORPE said that the relocation jurisprudence set a high test for anyone applying to remove a child from the jurisdiction permanently for the obvious reasons of upheaval to the children and reduction in contact to the other parent.
However, considerations relevant to an application to relocate permanently were simply not automatically, if at all, applicable to applications for temporary removal.
It seemed to his Lordship that the judge, in assessing the detriment to the child, made her assessment as though the removal would be permanent...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Foley v Sunday Newspapers Ltd
...2 CH 269 HERBAGE v PRESSDRAM LTD 1984 2 ALL ER 769 1984 1 WLR 1160 GREENE v ASSOCIATED NEWSPAPERS LTD 2005 1 ALL ER 30 2005 3 WLR 281 TLR 10.11.2004 EUROPEAN CONVENTION HUMAN RIGHTS ART 40 SPUC v GROGAN 1989 IR 753 1990 ILRM 350 1990 1 CMLR 689 M v DRURY 1994 2 IR 8 1995 1 ILRM 108 VENABL......
-
Buried by the Sands of Time: The Problem with Peremption
...issues lurk within prescription? _______________ [1] James Barron, Turkey and Stuffing? Yawn. We're Jumping Ahead to Christmas, N.Y. TIMES, Nov. 10, 2004, at [2] See generally Stephen W. Jones & Melissa Beard Glover, The Attack on Traditional Billing Practices, 20 U. ARK. LITTLE ROCK L.......
-
National security information flow: from source to reporter's privilege.
...(350.) Editorial, Press Freedom, supra note 349, at A16; see also Nicholas D. Kristof, Op-Ed., Our Not-So-Free Press, N.Y. TIMES (Nov. 10, 2004), http://www.nytimes.com/2004/11/10/opinion/10kris.html (reporting that three federal judges found eight different journalists in contempt of court......
-
The underprivileged profession: the case for Supreme Court recognition of the journalist's privilege.
...free press that's only free enough to write stories of no consequence."); Nicholas D. Kristof, Editorial, Our Not-So-Free Press, N.Y. TIMES, Nov. 10, 2004, at A25 (equating the United States to China and Zimbabwe for "throwing journalists in prison"); Editorial, Press Imprisoned: Jailing Re......
-
The Washington 2004 Gubernatorial Election Crisis: the Necessity of Restoring Public Confidence in the Electoral Process
...Lead to 8,700 Votes, Seattle Times, Nov. 9,2004, at B1. 127. Ralph Thomas, Rossi Ahead, Names Team for Possible Transition, SEATTLE TIMES, Nov. 10,2004, at 128. Ralph Thomas and Keith Ervin, Rossi Maintains Lead; Gregoire Holds Out Hope, SEATTLE TIMES, Nov. 11,2004, at B1. 129. Keith Ervin,......