Re A. & B.C. Chewing Gum Ltd

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Year1975
Date1975
CourtChancery Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
76 cases
  • Grand Pacific Holdings Ltd v Pacific China Holdings Ltd [Eastern Caribbean Supreme Court]
    • British Virgin Islands
    • High Court (British Virgin Islands)
    • 11 January 2010
    ...not grant a stay. 4 In the course of argument I drew the attention of Counsel to the decision of Plowman J inre A&BC Chewing Gum Ltd [1975] 1 WLR 5793. The learned Judge had made an order for winding up on just and equitable grounds at the instance of disaffected contributories. He refused ......
  • MBF Finance Berhad v Sri Hartamas Development Sdn Bhd (No.1) (1993) 3 MSCLC 90, 893;
    • Malaysia
    • High Court (Malaysia)
    • 1 January 1992
  • Teo Choon Mong Frank v Wilh Schulz Gmbh and Another
    • Singapore
    • Court of Appeal (Singapore)
    • 9 May 1998
    ...of the Kuching plant. There was therefore no inconsistency or conflict between the two injunctions: at [21]. A & BC Chewing Gum Ltd, Re [1975] 1 WLR 579; [1975] 1 ALL ER 1017 (folld) Bank of America National Trust and Savings Association v Djoni Widjaja [1994] 2 SLR (R) 898; [1994] 2 SLR 81......
  • Re Parmalat Capital Fin Ltd
    • Cayman Islands
    • Court of Appeal (Cayman Islands)
    • 21 July 2006
    ...Corbett for the respondents; C.G. Quin, Q.C. for the Bank of America (a creditor). Case cited: (1) In re A. & B.C. Chewing Gum Ltd., [1975] 1 W.L.R. 579; [1975] 1 All E.R. 1017, followed. Legislation construed: Companies Law (2004 Revision), s.103: The relevant terms of this section are set......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
3 firm's commentaries
  • A Dispute With The Company Or Between Shareholders? The Characterisation Of Just And Equitable Winding-up Petitions
    • Cayman Islands
    • Mondaq Cayman Islands
    • 25 August 2022
    ...3. Companies Winding Up Rules, O.3, r.12(1). 4. Financial Services Division Guide (August 2015), C6.5. 5. Re A & BC Chewing Gum Ltd [1975] 1 WLR 579; Re Crossmore Electrical & Civil Engineering Ltd (1989) 5 BCC 37; Re a Company No 005685 of 1988 ex parte Schwarcz (1989) 5 BCC 79; Re Freerid......
  • BVI Shareholder Disputes: Winding Up On Just And Equitable Grounds
    • British Virgin Islands
    • Mondaq Virgin Islands
    • 30 January 2022
    ...has been a breach of an agreement contained in the articles of association and/or any shareholders' agreement (Re A & BC Chewing Gum Ltd [1975] 1 WLR 579, even where there is an entire agreement clause (Union Zone). There may be cases where it is unfair for those conducting the affairs of t......
  • BVI Shareholder Disputes: Winding Up On Just And Equitable Grounds
    • British Virgin Islands
    • Mondaq Virgin Islands
    • 30 January 2022
    ...has been a breach of an agreement contained in the articles of association and/or any shareholders' agreement (Re A & BC Chewing Gum Ltd [1975] 1 WLR 579, even where there is an entire agreement clause (Union Zone). There may be cases where it is unfair for those conducting the affairs of t......
3 books & journal articles
  • DISCLOSURE OF THE COMPANY'S PRIVILEGED DOCUMENTS TO SHAREHOLDERS AS AN APPLICATION OF JOINT INTEREST PRIVILEGE
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2020, December 2020
    • 1 December 2020
    ...party for privilege purposes in an application for just and equitable winding up because the same was done in Re A & BC Chewing Gum Ltd [1975] 1 WLR 579 at 592, which concerned the rule against company participation in shareholder disputes. 67 Re a company (No 1126 of 1992) [1994] 2 BCLC 14......
  • Insolvency Law
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Annual Review No. 2013, December 2013
    • 1 December 2013
    ...The learned judge referred to the decision by the English Chancery Court in In re A& BC Chewing Gum Ltd, Topps Chewing Gum Inc v Coakley[1975] 1 WLR 579 which held that, as a matter of practice, a stay of execution of a winding-up order will not be granted pending an appeal against that ord......
  • DEVELOP OR WIND UP?
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 1992, December 1992
    • 1 December 1992
    ...A.C. 360. 30 Ibid, at p.379. 31 Supra, n.1 at p.263. 32 Supra, n.29 at p.379, 380. 33 Ibid, at p.380. 34 See Re A&BC Chewing Gum Ltd[1975] 1 W.L.R. 579. * LL.B. (Sing) LL.M (Cantab), Advocate & Solicitor, Supreme Court of Singapore, Lecturer in Law, School of Accountancy & Business, NTU Sin......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT