Re Barney. Barney v Barney
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1892 |
| Year | 1892 |
| Court | Chancery Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
6 cases
-
Trustor AB v Smallbone (No 2)
...... Barnes v Addy ( 1874 ) LR 9 Ch App 244 . Barney, In re [ 1892 ] 2 Ch 265 . Company, In re A [ 1985 ] BCLC 333 , CA . Cowan de Groot ......
-
M'Ardle v Gaughran
...Banner v. BerridgeELR 18 Ch. D. 254. Barnes v. AddyELR L. R. 9 Ch 244. Barnes v. AddyELR L. R. 9 Ch. 244, 251. Barney v. BarneyELR [1892] 2 Ch. 265. Bridgman v. GillENR 24 Beav. 302. Burdick v. GarrickELR L. R. 5 Ch. 233. Gray v. Bateman 21 W. R. 137. Lake v. BellELR 34 Ch. D. 462. Lee v. S......
-
Richard Dean Martin and Others v Stuart Lee Myers and Another
...out, legal title is nowadays vested in the Public Trustee (until 1994 in the probate judge). As was said by Kekewich J in Re Barney [1892] 2 Ch 265 at 272–273: "[I]t is essential to the character of the trustee that he should have trust property actually vested in him or so far under his co......
-
Lily Cheung And Another v The Standard Chartered Bank Hong Kong Trustee Ltd And Others
...to do but require that, perhaps by one process, perhaps by another, [the assets] should be vested in hint' (Kekewich J. in Re Barney [1892]2 Ch. 265, at 273) so that he bad such a 'title' that, if he had no beneficial rights to the assets, he would be holding them on trust for those who had......
Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
-
Dishonest Assistance and Accessory Liability
...Law Journal 1, 2-3.82 Jones vChurcher [2009] EWHC 722 (QB), [2009] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 94 at [66]-[78] per Havelock-Allan QC.83 Re Barney [1892] 2 Ch 265; Mara vBrowne [1896] 1 Ch 199 (CA).84 As noted by S. Gardner, ‘Knowing Assistance and Knowing Receipt: Taking Stock’ (1996) 112LQR 56, 92.85 Se......
-
Remedies for Dishonest Assistance
...case in which the language of constructivetrusteeship was understood as meaning that a dishonest assistant is a custodian of24 Re Barney[1892]2 Ch 265, 273 (KekewichJ).25 RoyalBrunei, above n 2,382 (Lord Nicholls). See too Houghton vFa yers [2000] Lloyd’s Rep Bank145( CA) 149; MontrealTrust......