Re Bidie, decd. Bidie v General Accident Fire and Life Assurance Corporation Ltd

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtCourt of Appeal
Year1948
Date1948

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
88 cases
  • Rodney v Loncke and Another
    • Guyana
    • Supreme Court (British Guiana)
    • Invalid date
  • George Municipality v Vena and Another
    • South Africa
    • South Africa Law Reports
    • 30 November 1988
    ...Winery Ltd v Distillers Corporation (SA) Ltd and Another 1962 (1) SA 458 (A) at 476; IRC v Mobil Ltd (supra at 1071); In re Bidie [1949] 1 CH 121 (CA) ([1948] 2 ER 995); Hleka v Johannesburg City Council 1949 (1) SA 842 (A) F at 851 - 3; L C Steyn Uitleg van Wette 5th ed at 97, 101; Benning......
  • Denman Island Local Trust Committee v. 4064 Investments Ltd.,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • 19 December 2001
    ...context of the Act as a whole and that of Part 2 in which it appears: In Bidie v. General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corp. , [1948] 2 All E.R. 995 (Eng. C.A.), Lord Greene said at 998: 'The first thing one has to do ... in construing words in a section of an Act of Parliament is not......
  • Mosey v Mosey and Barker
    • United Kingdom
    • Probate, Divorce and Admiralty Division
    • Invalid date
    ...669; 49 T.L.R. 381. F15[1942] Ch. 318; 58 T.L.R. 252; [1942] 1 All E.R. 583. F16[1948] Ch. 697; affd. [1949] Ch. 121; 65 T.L.R. 25; [1948] 2 All E.R. 995. F17[1893] P. F18[1952] P. 184, 191; [1952] 1 T.L.R. 1479; [1952] 1 All E.R. 1128. F19[1948] P. 198. F20[1893] P. 284, 287: “‘The court c......
  • Get Started for Free
2 books & journal articles
  • 2007 index
    • South Africa
    • Juta South African Criminal Law Journal No. , August 2019
    • 16 August 2019
    ...YUGOSLAVIAProsecutor v Tadić IT 94-1-A, 1999 ...................................................... 361-71UNITED KINGDOMBidie, In re [1948] 2 All ER 995 ............................................................ 70R v Goodyear (2005) 3 All ER 117 ................................................
  • Case Review: The test for possession of a private firearm by a security officer whilst on duty in South African private security law: A warning voice from KwaZulu-Natal
    • South Africa
    • Juta South African Criminal Law Journal No. , May 2019
    • 24 May 2019
    ...contextwithin which the provision to be interpreted finds itself should be prop-erly considered and applied. For instance, in Re Bidie [1949] Ch 121,cited with approval by Schreiner JA in Jaga v Donges NO 1950 (4) SA653 (A) at 663, Lord Greene had the following to say:‘The first thing to be......