Re Biss. Biss v Biss

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1903
CourtCourt of Appeal
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
29 cases
  • Chan v Zacharia
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • Invalid date
  • Chelsea Estates Investment Trust Company Ltd v Marche
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • Invalid date
    ... ... Ewart v. Fryer [ 1901 ] 1 Ch. 499 , 512; 18 T.L.R. 596 , In re Biss [ 1903 ] 2 Ch. 40 and Nelson v. Hannam [ 1943 ] Ch. 59 ; 59 T.L.R. 128 ; [ 1942 ... ...
  • Frank Pile v Simon Pile
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 29 July 2022
    ...obtain any renewal of the lease for the benefit of the cestui que trust. The underlying principle, as explained by Buckley J in Re Biss [1903] 2 Ch 40, at p.43, is that “the trustee owes it to his cestui que trust to obtain a renewal, if he can do so, on beneficial terms, and that the cour......
  • Buhr and Others v Barclays Bank Plc
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 25 July 2001
    ...of accretions to or substitution of the mortgaged property equity has undoubtedly treated the mortgagor as a fiduciary (see Re Biss [1903] 2 Ch 40). There is no difficulty in law with a person being a fiduciary towards another in respect of some aspects only of that person's duty to that o......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT