Re Brace. Welch v Colt
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Year | 1891 |
| Date | 1891 |
| Court | Chancery Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 7-day Trial
8 cases
-
Tasarruf Mevduati Sigorta Fonu Plaintiff v 1. Merril Lynch Bank and Trust Company (Cayman) Ltd (‘Mlbtc’) 2. Kaffee Ltd 3. Barla Finance Ltd 4. Cunur Cash Ltd 5. Medro Ltd 6. Yahya Murat Demirel Defendants Tasarruf Mevduati Sigorta Fonu Plaintiff v 1. Merril Lynch Bank and Trust Company (Cayman) Ltd (‘Mlbtc’) 2. Kaffee Ltd 3. Barla Finance Ltd 4. Cunur Cash Ltd 5. Medro Ltd 6. Yahya Murat Demirel Defendants
...are not within the meaning of property under the Wills Law. There is judicial pronouncement to this effect: InRe Brace, Welch v Colt [1891] 2 Ch. 671; it was held that a general devise or bequest in a will did not operate as an exercise of a power vested in a testator to revoke existing tru......
-
TMSF v Merrill Lynch
...181; 88 E.R. 976, referred to. (2) Bourne v. Colodense Ltd., [1985] ICR 291; [1985] IRLR 339, referred to. (3) Brace, Re, Welsh v. Colt, [1891] 2 Ch. 671, considered. (4) Clarkson v. Clarkson, [1994] BCC 921; [1996] BPIR 37, considered. (5) Commr. of Stamp Duties v. Stephen, [1904] A.C. 137......
-
Re Boland, Smithwick v Smithwick
...Eq. 442. (2) 27 Ch. D. 696. (3) 63 L. T. 92. (4) [1901] 1 Ch. 677. (5) [1946] 1 All E. R. 23. (6) 41 Ch. D. 417. (7) 43 Ch. D. 222. (8) [1891] 2 Ch. 671. (9) [1957] Ch. (10) 17 L. R. Ir. 436. (11) [1945] Ch. 21. (12) [1960] I. R. 7. (1) [1960] I. R. 7. ...
-
Equiom (Isle of Man) Ltd v Peter Christian Velarde
...a revocation of a prior exercise of a power of appointment. He referred to four cases: Pomfret v Perring 43 ER 1071, In re Brace [1891] 2 Ch 671, In re Thursby's Settlement [1910] 2 Ch 181 and In re Barker's Settlement [1920] 1 Ch 527. The principles that the Deputy Master drew from that re......
Get Started for Free