Re Braemar Investments Ltd

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Year1988
Date1988
CourtChancery Division

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
10 cases
  • Sculptor Finance (MD) Ireland Ltd v Media Development Authority of Singapore
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 24 January 2013
    ...factor, it did not necessarily preclude the court from granting an extension of time as was confirmed in Re Braemar Investments Ltd[1989] Ch 54: at [23] . (6) It was just and equitable in all the circumstances to grant the application subject to the liquidator's rights to set the registrati......
  • Media Development Authority of Singapore v Sculptor Finance (MD) Ireland Ltd
    • Singapore
    • Court of Appeal (Singapore)
    • 7 November 2013
    ...(folld) Ayala Holdings Ltd, Re [1993] BCLC 256 (folld) Ayerst v C & K (Construction) Ltd [1976] AC 167 (refd) Braemar Investments Ltd, Re [1989] 1 Ch 54 (refd) Cambridge Gas Transportation Corp v Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Navigator Holdings plc [2007] 1 AC 508 (refd) City......
  • Media Development Authority of Singapore v Sculptor Finance (MD) Ireland Ltd
    • Singapore
    • Court of Appeal (Singapore)
    • 7 November 2013
    ...was adopted in In re L H Charles & Company, Ltd [1935] WN 15 (“re Charles”) and endorsed by Hoffmann J in In re Braemar Investments Ltd [1989] 1 Ch 54 at 60. Whichever approach is preferred by the court, what is clear is that the court’s decision is a matter of discretion and not of law (As......
  • Exeter Trust Ltd v Screenways Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 8 May 1991
    ...to apply to discharge the order within a specified period after a winding up becoming effective on or before a specified date. In re Braemar Investments Ltd [1989] Ch. 54, at page 60D—E, Hoffmann J. thought that an order in the L.H. Charles & Co. Ltd form was a sensible way of dealing w......
  • Get Started for Free
2 books & journal articles
  • Case Note
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2014, December 2014
    • 1 December 2014
    ...Ltd[1983] Ch 110 at 123. 54Media Development Authority of Singapore v Sculptor Finance (MD) Ireland Ltd[2014] 1 SLR 733 at [56]. 55[1989] 1 Ch 54. 56Re Braemar Investments Ltd[1989] 1 Ch 54 at 60. 57[1983] Ch 110 at 131. 58[1983] Ch 132 at 133–134, per Lord Denning MR and 134, per Davies LJ......
  • Company Law
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Annual Review No. 2014, December 2014
    • 1 December 2014
    ...the extension were not met such that the judge should not have exercised his discretion to extend time: Re Braemar Investments Ltd[1989] 1 Ch 54. The policy consideration in issue is different, namely whether the court should even consider such cases given the insolvency of the company or t......