Re C (Adult: Refusal of Treatment)

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtFamily Division
Judgment Date1994
Year1994
Date1994

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
81 cases
  • B v Croydon Health Authority
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • Invalid date
  • Fitzpatrick v F.K. and another
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 25 April 2008
    ...(No 2) [1996] 2 IR 79, In re T (Adult: refusal of medical treatment) [1993] Fam 95, In Re C (Adult: refusal of medical treatment) [1994] 1 WLR 290, In re MB (Medical Treatment) [1997] 2 FLR 426, HE v A Hospital NHS Trust [2003] EWHC 1017 (Fam), [2003] 2 FLR 408 and Malette v Shulman (1990)......
  • Re M B (Caesarian section)
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 26 March 1997
    ... ... -Sloss, Lord Justice Saville and Lord Justice Ward Court of Appeal Medical treatment - phobia against needles resulting in incompetence - non-consensual treatment Phobia caused ... of the evidence was necessary because fear of an operation might be a rational reason for refusal to undergo it. Fear might also, however, paralyse the will and thus destroy the capacity to make a ... situation in which it was lawful for doctors to intervene was if it was believed that the adult patient lacked the capacity to decide. On the present state of the English law the submission ... ...
  • Tameside and Glossop Acute Services Trust v CH
    • United Kingdom
    • Family Division
    • Invalid date
    ...v Bland[1994] 1 FCR 485; [1993] AC 789; [1993] 2 WLR 316; [1993] 1 All ER 821. C (An Adult: Refusal of Treatment), Re[1994] 2 FCR 151; [1994] 1 WLR 290; [1994] 1 All ER 819. F v Riverside Mental Health NHS Trust[1994] 2 FCR 577. F (In Utero), Re [1988] FCR 529; [1988] Fam 122; [1988] 2 WLR ......
  • Get Started for Free
1 firm's commentaries
  • Advance Directives
    • United Kingdom
    • Mondaq United Kingdom
    • 11 September 2003
    ...1 Re T (Adult: Refusal of Treatment) [1992] WLR 782 2 Airedale NHS Trust v Bland [1993] AC 78 3 Re C (Adult Refusal of Treatment) [1994] 1 WLR 290 4 "Making Decisions" The Government's proposals for making decisions on behalf of mentally incapacitated adults. © RadcliffesLeBrasseur The cont......
5 books & journal articles
  • Added Value: Using Human Rights to Support Psychiatric Advance Statements
    • United Kingdom
    • Edinburgh University Press Edinburgh Law Review No. , May 2013
    • 1 May 2013
    ...not.66See Re T (Adult: Refusal of Treatment) [1993] Fam 95 at para 103 per Lord Donaldson MR; Re C (Adult: Refusal of Medical Treatment) [1994] 1 WLR 290; Airedale NHS Trust v Bland [1993] AC 789. The approach in Scotland is unlikely to be different.77Scottish Law Commission, Report on Inca......
  • Culpability, Kingston and the Law Commission
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Journal of Criminal Law, The No. 74-5, October 2010
    • 1 October 2010
    ...not to def‌ine ‘mental disorder’ but to leave it to the medicalprofession.155 See, e.g. Re C (Adult: Refusal of Medical Treatment) [1994] 1 All ER 819.156 Under the French Penal Code, Art. 64 provided that a person could not be guiltyof a criminal offence if he was insane. This was interpre......
  • Consent and conflict in medico-legal decision-making at the end of life: a critical issue in the Canadian context.
    • Canada
    • University of New Brunswick Law Journal No. 60, January 2010
    • 1 January 2010
    ...note 26, s. 3.These statutory tests are reflective of the common law as enunciated in Re C (adult: refusal of medical treatment), [1994] 1 All E.R. 819 (H.C.), and Re MB (adult: medical treatment), [1997] 2 F.C.R. 541 (28) Supra, note, 8, ss. 8 and 10, supra, note 9, s. 9, and supra, note, ......
  • The Regulation of Dermal Fillers in English Law
    • United Kingdom
    • Southampton Student Law Review No. 11-1, January 2021
    • 1 January 2021
    ...Law: Justifiable Inconsistency or Blinkered Moralism?’ (2007) 15 Health Care Analysis 235. 81 Re C (Adult: Refusal of Medical Treatment) [1994] 1 WLR 290. 32 (2021) Vol. 11 assessing this, declaring that capacity is found when patients comprehend and retain information, believe it, and weig......
  • Get Started for Free