Re C. L
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Year | 1968 |
| Date | 1968 |
| Court | Court of Protection |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
11 cases
-
W v M & D
...2010 SI 149/2010 RSC O. 3 r11B LAND & CONVEYANCING LAW REFORM ACT 2009 S24(4) LAND & CONVEYANCING LAW REFORM ACT 2009 S24(5) L (C), IN RE 1969 1 CH 587 1968 2 WLR 1275 1968 1 AER 1104 MCGHEE & ORS SNELLS EQUITY 31ED 2005 662 TINKERS SETTLEMENT, IN RE 1960 1 WLR 1011 1960 3 AER 85 (NOTE) LAN......
-
V v T and Another
...and the details of the case. There are three cases cited where the report is anonymised; these are Re T's Settlement Trusts [1964] Ch 158, Re C L [1969] 1 Ch 587 and CD (a minor) v O [2004] 3 All ER 780. In Re T, the application was heard in chambers on the ground that "it involved consider......
-
X and Another v A and Others
...to apply for this purpose is not excessive." 37 Subsequent cases have further illustrated the width of the word "benefit" in this context: Re C.L. [1969] 1 Ch. 587 (where the transaction involved the extinction of the beneficiary's interest in favour of her adopted children and a consequen......
-
Wright v Gater
...and the 1958 Act did not alter this: see Re T's Settlement Trusts [1964] Ch 158 at 161. Rather, I am supplying consent on behalf of Rory: Re S [2006] WTLR 1461 at para. [16]. The question to be asked is therefore: "Should Rory consent to this arrangement?". That question is answered in the ......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
-
Benefiting Non-objects With Powers Of Appointment: Squaring The Circle?
...v IRC [1964] AC 612. 2. [2005] EWHC 2706 (Ch). See generally on this Lewin on Trusts (20 ed), paras 32-015 to 32-016. 3. See Re CL [1969] 1 Ch 587. 4. A case which might suggest that the use of the words "for the benefit of the beneficiaries" do not make any difference to the limited scope ......
1 books & journal articles
-
Variation of Trusts: Settlors' Intentions and the Consent Principle in Saunders v Vautier
...Trusts [1970] 1 Ch 560, 565.17 Re Remnant’s Settlement Trusts [1970] 1 Ch 560, 565, per Pennycuick J.18 [1964] 1 WLR 449, 450.19 Re CL [1969] 1 Ch 587; Re T [1964] 1 Ch 158.20 [1969] 1 Ch 223.The Modern Law Review [Vol. 60722 The Modern Law Review Limited be to their social or moral detrime......