Re Cawley & Company

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtCourt of Appeal
Date1888
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
3 cases
  • Attorney General for Ireland v Jameson
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 13 Febrero 1904
    ...(2) 18 Beav. 330. (3) 38 Ch. D. 176. (1) 11 H. L. Cas. 257. (2) [1901] 1 Ch. 279. (3) [1902] 1 I. R. 376, 383. (1) L. R. 1 Eq. 567. (1) 42 Ch. D. 209, (2) [1901] 1 Ch. 279. (1) 10 H. L. Cas. 367. (1) [1901] 1 Ch. 279. (1) [1901] I. R. at p. 393. (2) 20 Ch. D. 562. (1) 18 Beav. 330. (2) 26 C......
  • M'Lintock v Campbell
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Session
    • 25 Mayo 1916
    ...8 R. 642, Lord Justice-Clerk Moncreiff, at pp. 6445. 3 Buckley on Company Law, (9th ed.) 35. 4 Buckley on Company Law, (9th ed.) 62930. 5 42 Ch. D. 209, Lord Esher, M.R., at p. 229, Cotton, L.J., at p. 232, Fry, L.J., at p. 235. 6 [1910] 1 Ch. 312. 7 Liquidator of the Florida Mortgage and I......
  • Wilson v Manna Hill Mining Company Pty Ltd
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • Invalid date
1 books & journal articles
  • A Subaltern Theory of Equity
    • United Kingdom
    • African Journal of International and Comparative Law No. , February 2016
    • 1 Febrero 2016
    ...against the director, Lord Fry said thus: ‘If we were sitting in a court of honour, our decision might be different.’77Re Cowley & Co, (1889) 42 Ch. D. 209 at The apparent lack of coherence with regard to equity's function is easy to explain in historical terms as a product of its specific ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT