Re Chapman. Cocks v Chapman
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1896 |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
23 cases
- Arab-Malaysian Finance Bhd; Lori (M) Bhd (Interim Receiver)
- Negeri Sembilan Development Corporation, The; United Asian Bank Bhd
-
John P Greene and Others v Danny Coady and Others
...received. It is sufficient that the trustee has been guilty of a want of ordinary prudence: see e.g. In re Chapman; Cocks v. Chapman [1896] 2 Ch. 763. In the context of a trustee exclusion clause, however, such as section 30 of the Trustee Act 1925, it means a deliberate breach of trust: In......
-
Armitage v Nurse
...diligence have received. It is sufficient that the trustee has been guilty of a want of ordinary prudence: see, for example, Re Chapman [1896] 2 Ch. 763. In the context of a trustee exclusion clause, however, such as Section 30 of the Trustee Act, 1925 it means a deliberate breach of trust......
Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
-
Equitable compensation for breach of trust: off Target.
...of Chancery (William Maxwell, 1862) 80. (47) Armitage v Nurse [1998] Ch 241, 252 (Millett LJ). See also Re Chapman; Cocks v Chapman [1896] 2 Ch 763, 776 (Lindley LJ); Bartlett v Barclays Bank Trust Co Ltd [No 2] [1980] 1 Ch 539, 546 (Brightman LJ); Meehan v Glazier Holdings Pty Ltd (2002) 5......
-
Remoteness Criteria in Equity
...for the purchaser, which sued the solicitor when the engineering firm’s46 The Wagon Mound (No 1) [1961] AC 388 (PC) 423.47 Re Chapman [1896] 2 Ch 763 (CA) 774.48 Bristol and West Building Society vMothew [1998] Ch 1 (CA) 19.49 See Hodgkinson vSimms [1994] 3 SCR 377, 452–453.50 Swindle vHarr......