Re Coghlan (Deceased)

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtCourt of Appeal
Year1948
Date1948

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
8 cases
  • Martyn James v Lorraine Anne Scudamore
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 3 May 2023
    ...v Evans once more was not. 146 Slade J said (at 318C-E): “My general conclusion from the authorities cited to me, in particular In re Coghlan. decd. [1948] 2 All E.R. 68 is that they tend to support the view that the court will never strike out an action to revoke a grant of probate or lett......
  • Paul John McElroy v Lynne McElroy (in her capacity as administrator of the estate of Ray James McElroy and in her personal capacity)
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 20 January 2023
    ...re Flynn Deceased [1982] 1 WLR 310, Slade J said [at p. 318]: “My general conclusion from the authorities cited to me, in particular In re Coghlan, decd. [1948] 2 All E.R. 68, is that they tend to support the view that the court will never strike out an action to revoke a grant of probate o......
  • Beaudoin Estate et al. v. Taylor et al.,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 26 March 1999
    ...2 Rob. Eccl. 426, refd to. [para. 15]. Whiting v. Turner (1903), 89 L.T. 71, refd to. [para. 15]. Coghlan, Re; Briscoe v. Broughton, [1948] 2 All E.R. 68, refd to. [para. Biggin, Re; Bake v. McGregor and Public Trustee, [1949] O.W.N. 61 (H.C.), refd to. [para. 15]. Gow Estate, Re (1977), 9 ......
  • Serdahely Estate, Re, (2008) 453 A.R. 337 (QB)
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen''s Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 30 May 2008
    ...40]. Garland v. Consumers' Gas Co., [2004] 1 S.C.R. 629; 319 N.R. 38; 186 O.A.C. 128; 2004 SCC 25, refd to. [para. 44]. Coughlin, Re, [1948] 2 All E.R. 68 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 48]. Mohan v. Broughton, [1900] P. 56 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 48]. Odhavji Estate et al. v. Woodhouse et al., [2......
  • Get Started for Free