Re Company ex parte Schwartz; Re Company (No.005685 of 1988)

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtChancery Division (Companies Court)
Year1989
Date1989

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
4 cases
  • Re Freerider Ltd
    • Cayman Islands
    • Grand Court (Cayman Islands)
    • 11 November 2009
    ... ... Companies-compulsory winding up-parties-company to demonstrate participation in winding-up ... (6) Company (No. 004502 of 1988), ex p. Johnson, In re a , [1991] BCC 234 ; ... ...
  • Madera Technology Fund (CI)Ltd
    • Cayman Islands
    • Grand Court (Cayman Islands)
    • 26 April 2022
    ...January 2021 5 [1987] 3 BCC 375 6 [1991] BCC 234 7 Paragraph 21 8 [1872] L. R. 14 Eq. 322 9 [1975] 1 W.L.R. 579 10 (1989) 5 BCC 37 11 (1989) 5 BCC 79 12 [1991] BCC 19 13 [1993] BCC 325 14 [2004] BCC 955 15 Paragraph 39 of the judgment 16 Paragraph 44 of the judgment 17 Paragraph 45 of the ......
  • The Companies Act (2021 Revision) and Madera Technology Fund (CI)Ltd
    • Cayman Islands
    • Grand Court (Cayman Islands)
    • 26 April 2022
    ...January 2021 5 [1987] 3 BCC 375 6 [1991] BCC 234 7 Paragraph 21 8 [1872] L. R. 14 Eq. 322 9 [1975] 1 W.L.R. 579 10 (1989) 5 BCC 37 11 (1989) 5 BCC 79 12 [1991] BCC 19 13 [1993] BCC 325 14 [2004] BCC 955 15 Paragraph 39 of the judgment 16 Paragraph 44 of the judgment 17 Paragraph 45 of the ......
  • Re Parnip Investment Ltd.
    • Hong Kong
    • Court of Appeal (Hong Kong)
    • 29 November 1991
    ...a breach of the director's fiduciary duty; and that this ought not to be allowed upon the authority of Re a Company No. 005685 of 1988 (1989) 5 BCC 79. In that case Hoffmann J. was asked for sanction in the common formula that the company may pay debts in the ordinary course of business. It......
1 firm's commentaries