Re Company (No.004539 of 1993)
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1995 |
| Court | Chancery Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
29 cases
-
Weston v Dayman
... ... For that proposition he relied on Serious International Insurance Company v FIA General Insurance Limited [2004] 1WLR 3251 at page 3257, paragraph 18 in the speech of Lord ... ...
-
International Brands USA Inc. and Mark Stephen Goldstein and Shruth Ltd (in creditors voluntary liquidation); International Br ands USA Inc. and Interbr ands Inc. and Julian Haswell and Mark Stephen Goldstein and Shruth Ltd
...at the meeting; the court may take into account evidence available as at the date of the application pursuant to r4.70: see Re a Company No 004539 of 1993 [1995] BCLC 459 at 465f to 466g and Re Philip Alexander Securities & Futures Limited [1998] BCC 819 at 823E-G. Thus, she submitted, it w......
- Bacnet Pty Ltd (Acn 115 594 075) v Lift Capital Partners Pty Ltd (in Liquidation) (Acn 111 015 500)
-
Levi Solicitors LLP v David Frederick Wilson
...and decide whether, on balance, the claim against the company is established, and if so in what amount: Re a Company (no. 004539 of 1993) [1995] BCC 116 at 120, per Blackburne 19 Where the challenge is made by the creditor whose proof has been rejected, it is clearly established that the bu......
Request a trial to view additional results
2 firm's commentaries
-
Insolvency Insight - Issue 8 | February 2022
...review of the office-holder's decision, with the relevant creditor's claim being considered afresh (see Re a Company (no. 004539 of 1993) [1995] BCC 116) - and (ii) as a result, it was not the correctness of that decision that was in issue, but rather whether the disputed proof was establis......
-
Insolvency Insight - Issue 8 | February 2022
...review of the office-holder's decision, with the relevant creditor's claim being considered afresh (see Re a Company (no. 004539 of 1993) [1995] BCC 116) - and (ii) as a result, it was not the correctness of that decision that was in issue, but rather whether the disputed proof was establis......