Re a Company (No 006685 of 1996)

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1997
Year1997
CourtChancery Division

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
31 cases
  • Camulos v Kathrein
    • Cayman Islands
    • Court of Appeal (Cayman Islands)
    • 18 March 2010
    ...(5) Company (No. 003096 of 1987), Re aUNK(1987), 4 BCC 80, referred to. (6) Company (No. 006685 of 1996), In re a, [1997] BCC 830; [1997] 1 BCLC 639, dictum of Chadwick J. applied. (7) Cuthbert Cooper & Sons Ltd., Re, [1937] Ch. 392; [1937] 2 All E.R. 466, referred to. (8) Mann v. Goldstein......
  • Re FIA Leveraged Fund
    • Cayman Islands
    • Grand Court (Cayman Islands)
    • 23 April 2012
    ...(5) Company (No. 0010656 of 1990), Re a, [1991] BCLC 464, dictum of Harman J. applied. (6) Company (No. 006685 of 1996), In re a, [1997] 1 BCLC 639; [1997] BCC 830, dicta of Chadwick J. applied. (7) GFN Corp Ltd., In re, 2009 CILR 650, referred to. (8) Investors” Compensation Scheme Ltd. v.......
  • TUI UK Ltd v Griffiths
    • United Kingdom
    • Supreme Court
    • 29 November 2023
    ...v Farrer & Co [2004] EWHC 1774 (Ch); [2004] BPIR 1218, para 60, in which Rimer J quotes from the judgment of Chadwick J in In re Company (No 006685 of 1996) [1997] 1 BCLC 639, 63 Thirdly, there may be a bold assertion of opinion in an expert's report without any reasoning to support it......
  • Lyubov Andreevna Kireeva (as bankruptcy trustee of Georgy Ivanovich Bedzhamov) v Georgy Ivanovich Bedzhamov
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 21 January 2022
    ...which he referred included Re Lo-Line Electric Motors Ltd [1988] Ch 477 at 487, Re Keypak Homecare Ltd [1990] BCLC 440 at 446, Re a company (No 006685 of 1996) [1997] 1 BCLC 639 at 648, Re Hopes (Heathrow) Ltd [2001] 1 BCLC 575 at 582, Long v Farrer & Co [2004] BPIR 1218 at paragrap......
  • Get Started for Free
2 books & journal articles
  • WINDING UP PETITIONS FOUNDED ON A BONA FIDE DISPUTED DEBT
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 1998, December 1998
    • 1 December 1998
    ...2 MLJ 308 at 313; Salak Park Development Sdn Bhd v Fajar Menyensing Sdn Bhd[1994] 4 CLJ 580 at 582c; Re a Company (No 006685 of 1996)[1997] 1 BCLC 639 at 643a and 644a; Re Richbell Strategic Holdings Ltd[1997] 2 BCLC 429 at 435a—b. 9 Alipour v Ary [1997] 1 WLR 534 at 541F—H. See also Re Bon......
  • Insolvency Law
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Annual Review No. 2005, December 2005
    • 1 December 2005
    ...(see Re Claybridge Shipping Co SA[1997] 1 BCLC 572 at 575, Alipour v Ary[1997] 1 WLR 534 at 542 and Re a Company (No 006685 of 1996)[1997] 1 BCLC 639 at 644). However, there are Australian authorities opining that the burden to establish a bona fide dispute is somewhat heavier than that in ......