Re a Company (No 00836 of 1995)
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Court | Chancery Division |
| Year | 1996 |
| Date | 1996 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
8 cases
-
Horgan v Murray
...563 VIRDI V ABBEY LEISURE & ORS 1990 BCLC 342 COMPANIES ACT 1986 S125(2) (UK) A COMPANY (EX-PARTE), IN RE 1991 BCLC 597 A COMPANY, IN RE 1996 2 BCLC 192 MULGREW V O'BRIEN 1953 NI 10 A COMPANY, IN RE 1987 BCLC 94 A COMPANY, IN RE 1989 BCLC 365 Synopsis: [1997] 3 IR 29 -[ 1998] 1 ILRM 110 1 ......
-
Leong Quee Ching Karen v Lim Soon Huat
...003096 of 1987), Re A (1988) 4 BCC 80 (refd) Company (No 006834 of 1988), Re A [1989] BCLC 365 (refd) Company (No 00836 of 1995), Re A [1996] 2 BCLC 192 (refd) DyStar Global Holdings (Singapore) Pte Ltd v Kiri Industries Ltd [2018] 5 SLR 1 (refd) Eurogreen Building Products Pte Ltd v Savour......
-
Low Peng Boon v Low Janie and Others and Other Appeals
...Re A Company (No 003843 of 1986) [1987] BCLC 562; Re A Company (No 006834 of 1988) [1989] BCLC 365 and Re A Company (No 00836 of 1995) [1996] 2 BCLC 192, 197. We do not find these three cases of any assistance. In each of the three cases, the minority shareholders concerned petitioned to co......
-
Yeo Hung Khiang v Dickson Investment (Singapore) Pte Ltd and Others
...pursue his action further. The respondents cited Re A Company (No 003843 of 1986) [1987] BCLC 562 and Re A Company (No 00836 of 1995) [1996] 2 BCLC 192 as authorities in support. Even if the allegations of wrongdoing and oppression were true, these would merely constitute acts of oppression......
Get Started for Free
