Re Compton

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1945
Year1945
CourtCourt of Appeal

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
30 cases
  • Settlement of Shaik Salleh bin Obeid bin Abdat and Another, Re; Shaik Awad bin Mobarak bin Mohsin bin Abdat and Others v Shaik Ali bin Salleh bin Abdat
    • Malaysia
    • High Court (Malaysia)
    • 1 January 1954
  • Re Tree
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • Invalid date
    ... ... Held, that the testator had defined the class to be benefited, not by reference to descent from some specific individual or individuals selected by him as such, but by reference to a section of the public; and that the gift was a valid charitable gift ... In re Compton, ante p. 123, distinguished ... ADJOURNED SUMMONS ... A testator, who died on January 21, 1927, by his will dated March 1, 1926, directed his trustees to hold one half of his residuary estate on trust to “devote the income thereof from time to time as they may deem expedient for the purpose of ... ...
  • Re Hobourn Aero Components Ltd's Air Raid Distress Fund. Ryan v Forrest
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal
    • Invalid date
  • Re the Worth Library
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 1 January 1995
    ...Tax v. Pemsel [1891] A.C. 531; (1891) 61 L.J.Q.B. 265; 65 L.T. 621; 7 T.L.R. 657; 3 T.C. 53; 55 J.P. 805. Re Compton, Powell v. Compton [1945] Ch. 123; [1945] 1 All E.R. 198; (1944) 114 L.J. Ch. 99; 61 T.L.R. 167; 172 L.T. 158; 89 S.J. 142. In re Cranston, Webb v. Oldfield [1898] 1 I.R. 431......
  • Get Started for Free
3 books & journal articles
  • Table of Cases
    • United Kingdom
    • Wildy Simmonds & Hill Dissenting Judgments in the Law Preliminary Sections
    • 28 August 2018
    ...[1948] 2 All ER 593, [1948] WN 367, CA 133 Citco Banking Corporation NV v Pusser’s Ltd [2007] UKPC 13, [2007] 2 BCLC 483 135 Compton, Re [1945] Ch 123, [1945] 1 All ER 198, 172 LT 158, 61 TLR 167, [1945] WN 14, CA 197, 198, 200, 201, 207, 210 Consul Developments v DPC Estates (1975) 132 CLR......
  • Discounting Fiscal Privilege - A More Charitable Solution to the Public Benefit Question Lord MacDermott's Dissent in Oppenheim v Tobacco Securities Trust Co Ltd [1951] AC 297
    • United Kingdom
    • Wildy Simmonds & Hill Dissenting Judgments in the Law Part III - Equity and Property Law
    • 28 August 2018
    ...versed for many years in this difficult and very artificial branch of the law can be unaware of its illogicalities 10 7 In Re Compton [1945] Ch 123. 8 Ibid. 9 Above, n 6, at p 305. 10 Above, n 6, at p 307. 198 Part III – Equity and Property Law The truth of the first of these comments by Lo......
  • Public Benevolent Institutions for Native Title Groups: An Underappreciated Model?
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Federal Law Review No. 43-3, September 2015
    • 1 September 2015
    ...(Cambridge University Press, 2014) 159. 72 Oppenheim v Tobacco Securities Trust Co Ltd [1951] AC 297, 306 (Lord Simonds); Re Compton [1945] Ch 123, 128–9 (Lord Greene MR); Davies v Perpetual Trustee Co Ltd (1959) 59 SR (NSW) 112, 116, 118 (Privy Council). 73 See, eg, Dal Pont, above n 13, 5......