Re D. M. L
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Year | 1965 |
| Date | 1965 |
| Court | Court of Protection |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
9 cases
-
PB v RB (by her litigation friend the Official Solicitor) (1st Respondent) London Borough of Haringey (2nd Respondent)
...any infringement of her Article 5 and/or Article 8 rights which arises from its (provisional) conclusion is necessary and proportionate: see K v LBX (2012) EWCA Civ 79 at (35). Mental Capacity Act 2005 — Statutory principles 26 The statutory principles set out in the Mental Capacity Act 200......
-
Jemma Trust Company Ltd v Lewis and Others
...section. Sir Geoffrey's nephews and niece were not within the class of members of Lady Hulton's family; they were collateral relatives—see In re DML [1965] Ch 1133, at 1137D-E. Lady Hulton's own immediate family were opposed to the variation. Nor was there anything to suggest that Mr Butter......
- R v Andrew George Smith
-
PB v RB (by Her Litigation Friend, the Official Solicitor) (First Respondent) A London Borough (Second Respondent) CL (Third Respondent) DB (Fourth Respondent) LA (Fifth Respondent)
...Sir John Nicholl (referred to in the second edition of the said work). In the third edition, the editors provide an example by reference to Re DML [1965] Ch 1133. That case considered adjacent provisions in Section 102 of the Mental Health Act 1959. This section empowered the judge to secur......
Request a trial to view additional results