Re D. (A Minor) (Wardship: Sterilisation)
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1976 |
| Court | Family Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
39 cases
-
Re B. (A Minor) (Wardship: Sterilisation)
...then what legal courses would be open in the circumstances. 8We were invited to consider the decision of Heilbron J. in In Re D. (A Minor) (Wardship: Sterilisation) [1976] Fam. 185, 193, when the judge rightly referred to the irreversible nature of such an operation and the deprivation, wh......
- Re B (A Minor) (Wardship: Sterilization)
-
North Western Health Board v H.W.
...COURTS OF JUSTICE ACT 1936 CONSTITUTION ART 41.1.2 BUCK V BELL 1927 274 US 200 WHITE & WENDELL HOLMES LAW AND THE INNER SELF 407 D, RE 1976 FAM 185 SECONDARY, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & COMMUNITY SERVICES V JWB & SNB (MARIONS CASE) 1992 175 CLR 218 KENNEDY PATIENTS DOCTORS AND HUMAN RIGHTS CHI......
-
Re J (A Minor)
...of the child. This is not to say that it could not happen. This is clear from the facts of In re D (A Minor) (Wardship: Sterilisation) [1976] Fam. 185, where the child concerned had neither the intelligence nor understanding either to consent or refuse. There medical ethics did not prove a......
Request a trial to view additional results
4 books & journal articles
-
Essential Practice Guidance
...(Fam) and Re B (A Child) (Habitual Residence) (Inherent Jurisdiction) [2015] EWCA Civ 886. 2 In re D (A Minor) (Wardship: Sterilisation) [1976] Fam 185. 148 The Single Family Court: A Practitioner’s Handbook (a) the Designated Family Judge must be notified immediately; (b) the Designated Fa......
-
The Role of the Family Court of Australia in Child Welfare Matters
...aboutthe existence of aresidual jurisdiction capableofbeing exercised in acase such as InreD(AMinor) (Wardship: Sterilisation) [1976] 1All ER 326. This was asterilisation case and itis not clear whether the view expressed was intended to apply to all wardship matters.94Supra 14-17.9SWatson ......
-
Bodily Integrity, Embodiment, and the Regulation of Parental Choice
...helping tocontest intrusive interventions on the bodies of children , approaches528168 Elliston, op. cit., n. 140, p. 98.169 ReD[1976] 1 All E.R. 326, at 333.170 D. Davies, `Genetic Dilemmas and the Child's Right to an Open Future' (1997) 28Rutgers Law J. 547, at 570.171 D. Cornell, `Are Wo......
-
Expanding Eugenics or Improving Health Care in China: Commentary on the Provisions of the Standing Committee of the Gansu People’s Congress Concerning the Prohibition of Reproduction by Intellectually Impaired Persons
...Re B. (a minor)(wardship: sterilisation) [1987] 2 All E.R. 206. But seethe earlier decision in Re D. (a minor)(wardship: sterilisation) [1976] Fam. 185.52 Morgan and Lee, op. cit., n. 23. See, also, Between L and GM, applicants and MM,respondent and Director General of the Department of Fam......