Re Dawdy

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtCourt of Appeal
Year1885
Date1885

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
10 cases
  • R (County Council of Kildare) v Commissioner of Valuation
    • Ireland
    • Queen's Bench Division (Ireland)
    • 30 July 1901
    ...Holmes, L.JJ. (1) 18 Q. B. 687. (2) [1891] 1 Q. B. 378. (3) [1892] 1 Q. B. 431. (4) [1897] 1 Q. B. 659. (5) 71 L. T. (N. S.) 638. (6) 15 Q. B. D. 426, (7) 5 H. L. Cas. 811, 853. (8) 8 A. & E. 429. (9) 2 L. R. Ir. 371. (10) 6 Ir. Jur. (N. S.) 212. (1) 2 L. R. Ir. 371. ...
  • Pittalis v Sherefettin
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 27 February 1986
    ...of the rent to be determined by an expert. It is contended, therefore, that the case is not one of arbitration but of valuation (see Re Dawdy 15 Q.B.D. 426). I do not think that is correct. The lease provides that the determination should be "…in accordance so far as not inconsistent herewi......
  • Shoalhaven City Council v Firedam Civil Engineering Pty Ltd
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 5 October 2011
    ...Contracts, 12th ed (2010) at 706 [4–102]. 33 The distinction between expert and arbitrator was enunciated in In re Dawdy and Hartcup (1885) 15 QBD 426 at 430; In re Carus-Wilson and Greene (1886) 18 QBD 7 at 9 per Lord Esher MR, 10 per Lindley LJ and Lopes LJ. Recent decisions include Heart......
  • The Queen (Earl of Gosford) v The Irish Land Commission
    • Ireland
    • Court of Appeal (Ireland)
    • 12 February 1898
    ...P. D. 142. Markey v. Lord GosfordDLTR 31 I. L. T. R. 97. Overseers of Walsall v. L. & N. W. Railway Co.ELR 4 App. Cas. 30. Re DawdyELR 15 Q. B. D. 426. Re DawdyELR 15 Q. B. D. 430. Re Listowel FisheryUNKIR I. R. 9 C. L. 59. Reg. v. Bolton 1 Q. B. 66. Reg. v. Bolton 1 Q. B. 72. Reg. v. Chelt......
  • Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
  • Preliminary Sections
    • Nigeria
    • DSC Publications Online Nigerian Supreme Court Cases. 1991. Part I Preliminary Sections
    • 2 December 2022
    ...1. 608 Davy Bros, v. Garret (1877) 7 Ch. 473 .................................................................... 123 Dawdy and Hartcup, 15 Q B D 426......................................................................... 390 Deduwa & Ors. v. Okorodudu & Ors. (1974) 6 S.C. 21. CASES REFERR......