Re Dixon. Heynes v Dixon

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1900
CourtCourt of Appeal
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
15 cases
  • Pemungut Hasil Tanah, Kota Tinggi and Johore Sugar Plantations and Industries Bhd v Pemungut Hasil Tanah, Kota Tinggi; United Malayan Banking Corporation Bhd
    • Malaysia
    • High Court (Malaysia)
    • 1 January 1979
  • Pat O'Donnell & Company Ltd v Truck and Machinery Sales Ltd
    • Ireland
    • Supreme Court
    • 1 April 1998
    ...GOODS & SUPPLY OF SERVICES ACT 1980 S10 DUNLOP PNEUMATIC TYRE CO LTD V NEW GARAGE & MOTOR CO LTD 1915 AC 79 HEYNES V DIXON; DIXON, IN RE 1900 2 CH 561 REYNOLDS V PITT 1812 19 VES 134 BRIDGE V CAMPBELL DISCOUNT CO LTD 1962 1 AER 385 LONDON CHATHAM & DOVER RAILWAY CO V SOUTH EASTERN RAILWAY ......
  • Jobson v Johnson
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 25 May 1988
    ...to direct an issue of quantum damnificatus. If necessary, the court referred the calculation to a master (see Rigby L.J. in re Dixon (1900)2 Ch. 561, 576). Subsequently the common law courts became obliged to give effect to these equitable principles, under the statutes of 8 & 9 William 3,......
  • Williams v Central Bank of Nigeria
    • United Kingdom
    • Supreme Court
    • 19 February 2014
    ...following the decision in Soar v Ashwell, most judges were content to follow the dicta in that case: see In re Gallard [1897] 2 QB 8; Heynes v Dixon [1900] 2 Ch 561; In re Eyre-Williams [1923] 2 Ch 533 (although only the first of these cases was a true case of ancillary Statutory modific......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT