Re Ducker's Trade Mark

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1929
Year1929
CourtCourt of Appeal
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
20 cases
  • Imperial Group Ltd (Plaintiffs v Philip Morris & Company Ltd (Defendants
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 31 March 1981
    ...Section 32 is available when there is no intention to use: see In re Batts' Trade Mark, (1898) 15 Reports of Patent Cases, 534; Re Ducker's Trade Mark, (1928) 45 Reports of Patent Cases, 397 and Re Huggars Trade Mark, (1979) Fleet Street Reports, 310. Section 26 provides relief when there h......
  • Suyen Corporation v Americana International Ltd (No 2)
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • Invalid date
  • Goodman Fielder Pte Ltd v Conga Foods Pty Ltd
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 17 December 2020
    ...it means a resolve or settled purpose which has been reached at the time when the mark is to be registered’: see Re Ducker’s Trade Mark (1928) 45 RPC 397 at 123 It is not sufficient if the intention is “merely speculative” or of “an uncertain or indeterminate possibility: Optical 88 Limited......
  • Victoria's Secret Inc v Edgars Stores Ltd
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...but a resolve or settled purpose which has been reached at the time when the mark is to be registered' (In re Ducker's Trade Mark [1929] 1 Ch 113 (CA) at 121). (At 736J-737B and Since a trade mark is a purely territorial concept, the proprietorship, actual use, or proposed use of a trade ma......
  • Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
  • Creation of a Trade Mark in South African Law: a View with some Unconventional Elements
    • South Africa
    • Juta Stellenbosch Law Review No. , September 2019
    • 16 August 2019
    ...but a resolved or settled pur pose” (745F) In t his regard, the court adop ted dicta from an English ca se, In re Ducker’s Trade Mark [1929] 1 Ch 113 (CA) 121)88 The intention t o register is implie d: creation of a trade m ark by the proposal t o use a symbol is a prelim i-nary step i n th......