Re Dugdale. Dugdale v Dugdale
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Year | 1887 |
| Date | 1887 |
| Court | Chancery Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
13 cases
-
Cdn. Pacific v. Matsqui Indian Band, (1999) 243 N.R. 302 (FCA)
...1, refd to. [para. 121, footnote 71]. Macleay, In Re (1875), L.R. 20 Eq. 186, refd to. [para. 127, footnote 76]. Dugdale v. Dugdale (1888), 38 Ch. D. 176, refd to. [para. 127, footnote Reese et al. v. R. (1957), 10 D.L.R.(2d) 479 (S.C.C.), refd to. [para. 128, footnote 77]. Hartley v. Matso......
- Attorney General for Ireland v Jameson
-
Bindra v Chopra
...absolute interest to Angela —was repugnant to the rights that were incident to that interest and so void. The judge referred to In re Dugdale, Dugdale v. Dugdale (1888) 38 Ch.D. 176, in which Kay J said, at 182: “I apprehend that this is the test. An incident of the estate given which canno......
-
An v Barclays Private Bank & Trust (Cayman) Ltd
...& W. 727; 153 E.R. 1044, considered. (9) Dashwood v. Lord Bulkeley(1804), 10 Ves. 230; 32 E.R. 832, considered. (10) Dugdale, In reELR(1883), 38 Ch. D. 176, considered. (11) Evanturel v. EvanturelELR(1874), L.R. 6 P.C. 1; 1 QLR 74, followed. (12) Falkland (Lord) v. BertieENR(1692), 2 Vern. ......
Request a trial to view additional results
4 books & journal articles
-
REHABILITATING REPUGNANCY? PRESERVING THAT PIECE OF MEDIEVAL LUMBER.
...v Furber (1876) 3 Ch D 285 (Hunt-Foulston); Re Machu (1882) 21 Ch D 838 ('Re Machu); Re Rosher (n 9); Re Dugdale; Dugdale v Dugdale (1888) 38 Ch D 176 ('Re Dugdale); Metcalfe v Metcalfe (1889) 43 Ch D 633 ('Metcalfe"); Re Elliot (n 9); Re Smith; Smith v Smith [1916] 1 Ch 369 ('Re Smith); Re......
-
English fiduciary standards and trust law.
...[1997] 2 All E.R. 239. (222.) See Gosling v. Gosling, [1859] John 265; Weatherall v. Thornburgh, 8 Ch. D. 261,270 (1878); In re Dugdale, 38 Ch. D. 176 (1888); Metcalfe v. Metcalfe, 43 Ch. D. 633 (223.) See Crowe v. Appleby, [1975] 1 W.L.R. 1539 (Ch.); In re Weiner, [1956] 1 W.L.R. 579 (Ch.)......
-
SECURITY DEPOSIT ARRANGEMENTS IN INSOLVENCY
...18 Ves 429 at 381; Younghusband v Gisborne(1846) 15 LJ Ch 355 at 356. 10 Younghusband v Gisborne, supra, note 9; Re Dugdale(1888) 38 ChD 176. See also Hanbury & Martin, Modern Equity (14th Ed, 1993) at 190—1. Cf. Official Assignee v Parkinson(1885) 4 NZLR 145. 11 If the deposit moneys are n......
-
BANKRUPTCY AND THE OWNER OF AN HDB FLAT
...Act. 5 Conditions of purchase imposed by the HDB and section 50 HDB Act. 6 Ibid. 7 Ibid. 8 Re Machu (1882) 21 Ch. D. 838; Re Dugdale(1888) 38 Ch.D. 176. 9 [1996] 3 SLR 106. 10 Cap. 20 1996 Rev Ed. 11 See [1996] 3 SLR 106 at pp. 119—120. 12 E.g. charge imposed under section 6(3) Property Tax......