Re Engelbach's Estate. Tibbetts v Engelbach

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1924
Year1924
CourtChancery Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
20 cases
  • Re Foster
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • Invalid date
  • Sulisen Sdn Bhd v Kerajaan Malaysia
    • Malaysia
    • High Court (Malaysia)
    • 1 January 2006
  • McCabe v South City and County Investment Company Ltd
    • Ireland
    • Supreme Court
    • 1 January 1998
    ...a money consideration, agreedto purchase a deferred annuity for a fixed term, and that, as (according to the decision in In re Engelbach [1924] 2 CH 348) such annuity was payable to the respondent for his personal use, it became chargeable with income tax. Counsel for the respondent on the ......
  • Beswick (A.P.) v Beswick (A.P.)
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 29 June 1967
    ...involving this question. I am not sure that any conflicts with the view which I have expressed: but if any does, e.g. Engelbach [1924] 2 Ch. 348, I would not agree with it. I think that re Schebsman [1944] Ch. 83 was rightly decided and that the reasoning of Uthwatt J. ( [1943] Ch. 366) an......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • SECTION 73 CLPA1: ASSURANCE FOR THE SPOUSE AND CHILDREN
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 1997, December 1997
    • 1 December 1997
    ...1 Conveyancing and Law of Property Act, Cap 61, Rev Ed 1994. 2 Cap 146, 1985 Ed. 3 See Re Engelbach’s Estate, Tibbetts v Engelbach[1924] 2 Ch 348; Anuar bin Ismail v Tan Sri Tan Chin Tuan & Anor[1992] 1 MLJ 155. It may, however, be possible to consider an action in tort. In White v Jones, [......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT