Re F (Abduction: Unmarried Father: Sole Carer)
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 2003 |
| Year | 2003 |
| Court | Family Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
8 cases
-
McB v E
...56838/00) B (A MINOR) (CHILD ABDUCTION: CONSENT), IN RE 1994 2 FLR 249 1995 2 FCR 505 F (ABDUCTION: UNMARRIED FATHER: SOLE CARER), IN RE 2003 1 FLR 839 O (A MINOR) (CHILD ABDUCTION: CUSTODY RIGHTS), IN RE 1997 2 FLR 702 1997 2 FCR 465 A (AA) v H (AS) 2010 1 FLR 1 2009 3 FCR 95 2009 4 AER 64......
-
AAA v ASH and Others
...to be exercised. 90 The position was further explained and confined in the case of Re F (Abduction: Unmarried Father: Sole Carer) (2003) 1 FLR 839. There the father with sole care was held to have inchoate rights of custody. Dame Elizabeth Butler-Sloss P said: “I do not believe that those ......
-
A v H (Registrar General for England and Wales and another intervening)
...v Dennis[2000] 2 FCR 108, [2000] Fam 163, [2000] 2 FLR 231. F (abduction: unmarried father: sole carer), Re[2002] EWHC 2896 (Fam), [2003] 1 FLR 839. F (children) (abduction), Re[2008] EWHC 272 (Fam), [2008] 2 FCR 120, [2008] Fam 75, [2008] 3 WLR 527, [2008] 2 FLR Ghandi v Patel [2002] 1 FLR......
-
Re K (A Child) (Northern Ireland)
...in the country where the child is habitually resident but who have nevertheless played a role in the child's care. In Re W; Re B (Child Abduction: Unmarried Father) [1999] Fam 1, which concerned two different outgoing cases, I suggested that removing a child who is habitually resident here......
Request a trial to view additional results