Re Figgis, deceased
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1968 |
| Year | 1968 |
| Court | Chancery Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 7-day Trial
25 cases
-
Lynch v Burke
...1965 Pt VIII. Cases referred to in judgement Beechor v Major [1865] BLT 54. Diver v McCrea [1908] 42 ILTR 249. Figgis Deceased, In re [1969] 1 Ch 123, [1968] 2 WLR 1173, [1968] 1 All ER 999. Finucane v McMahon [1990] 1 IR 165. Gason v Rich 19 LR (Irl) 391. Hay v O’Grady 1 IR 210. Marshall v......
-
Wong Chim Ying v Cheng Kam Wing
...the date of acquisition) and not one like the joint bank account of a husband and wife under consideration by Megarry J. in In re Figgis [1969]1 Ch 123 at p.145 which fluctuates from day to day and whose character can be subject to change in accordance with changes in the intention of the (......
-
Lynn Drakeford v Russell Cotton and Another
...of authorities are cited in footnote 97. It seems to me that the passage in Lewin is based on what was said by Megarry J in In re Figgis [1969] 1 Ch 123 at 145F-146A. What was described in that passage was a case where a joint account had been operated for a lengthy period. It was held that......
-
Banque Indosuez v Madam Sumilan Awal also known as Aw Kim Lan and Others
...have remarked that it would be even more difficult to show that it was merely for convenience (In re Harrison at p 191; Re Figgis [1968] 1 All ER 999 at p 75. In the circumstances, I find that SK probably intended at the time of opening the joint accounts to retain the beneficial use of the......
Get Started for Free