Re Fitzgerald. Surman v Fitzgerald
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1904 |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
7 cases
-
Eng Liat Kiang v Eng Bak Hern
...439 (refd) Courtney, Re;Ex parte Pollard (1840) Mont & Ch 239; [1835-1842] All ER Rep 415 (refd) Fitzgerald, In re;Surman v Fitzgerald [1904] 1 Ch 573 (distd) Oceanic Sun Line Special Shipping Company Inc v Fay (1988) 165 CLR 197 (not folld) Penn v Baltimore (1750) 1 Ves Sen 444 (folld) Spi......
-
Sawrey-Cookson v Sawrey-Cookson's Trustees
...25 Beavan, 218; Pouey v. HordernELR, L. R., [1900] 1 Ch. 492; Tweedie v. MaunderELR, L. R., [1901] 1 Ch. 547; FitzgeraldELR, L. R., [1904] 1 Ch. 573; Corbet v. WaddellSC, Nov. 13, 1879, 7 R. 200; Bald v. BaldUNK, 1897, 76 L. T. such cases as Allan v. KerrUNK, 8 Macph. 34; Low's TrusteesSC, ......
-
Battye's Trustee v Battye
...S. C. 722; Scott's Executors v. Methven's ExecutorsSC, (1890) 17 R. 389. 5 (1844) 6 D. 904. 6 1914 S. C. 204. 1 In re FitzgeraldELR, [1904] 1 Ch. 573, per Cozens-Hardy, L.J., at p. 2 Brown's Trustees v. BrownUNK, (1890) 17 B. 1174; Stair v. HeadUNK, 6 D 904. 3 1914 S. C. 204. 4 6 D. 904. 1 ......
-
Hardie v Macfarlan's Judicial Factor
...its terms. I accordingly repel the whole pleas stated for the defender, and quoad ultra continue the case.’ 1 Surman v. FitzgeraldELR, [1904] 1 Ch. 573, per Cozens Hardy, L.J., at p. 589, Stirling, L. J., at p. 2 Bell's Com. (7th ed.), vol. i., p. 143. 3 Reid v. BellSC, (1884) 12 R. 178; Be......
Request a trial to view additional results