Re Forster's Settlement
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1942 |
| Year | 1942 |
| Court | Chancery Division |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
6 cases
-
The X Trusts
...not (see [80] and [85]), and in coming to her conclusion as to the scope of the role of protector, relied on only one case, namely Re Forster's Settlement [1942] 1 Ch. 125 But Re Forster's Settlement is not a case that was useful in the context of deciding the scope of the role of a fiducia......
-
Re The X Trusts
...[85]), and in coming to her conclusion as to the scope of the role of protector, relied on only one case, namely Re Forster's Settlement[1942] 1 Ch. 199. 125. But Re Forster's Settlement is not a case that was useful in the context of deciding the scope of the role of a fiduciary protector.......
-
Davis v Richards & Wallington Industries Ltd
...2 Ch. 679, C.A. Flavel's Will Trusts, In re [1969] 1 W.L.R. 444; [1969] 2 All E.R. 232 Forster's Settlement, In re [1942] Ch. 199; [1942] 1 All E.R. 180 Imperial Foods Ltd. Pension Scheme, In re [1986] 1 W.L.R. 717; [1986] 2 All E.R. 802 Leahy v. Attorney-General (N.S.W.) [1959] A.C. 457; [......
-
Ptnz v as
... ... Ms Stanley QC makes the point that in reality the trusts were settled by the 1st defendant as settlor. The settlement instruments are in materially identical terms. The trusts are discretionary in nature and the trustee has broad dispositive powers. Schedule 3 of the ... ...
Get Started for Free