Re General Rolling Stock Company. Chapman's Case

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtEquity
Year1865
Date1865

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
50 cases
  • The ‘STX Mumbai’
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 27 June 2014
    ...Re Barber & Co (1870) LR 9 Eq 725 (refd) Agra Bank, Re; Ex parte Tondeur (1867) LR 5 Eq 160 (refd) Asphaltic Wood Pavement Co, Re; Lee & Chapman's Case(1885) 30 Ch D 216 (distd) Brown Paper Mill Co v Irvin 146 F 2 d 232 (8th Cir, 1944) (refd) Chalmers, Ex parte; Re Edwards (1873) LR 8 Ch Ap......
  • Financial Services Compensation Scheme Ltd v Larnell (Insurances) Ltd ((in Liquidation))
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 29 November 2005
    ...Reinsurance International Company [2005] EWCA Civ 115. The operation of limitation periods in an insolvent administration: Re General Rolling Stock Co Ltd 13 I must describe next the position in an insolvency as regards the debtor's liabilities. In a voluntary winding-up, the liquidator's d......
  • Commercial Finance Company Ltd v Ramsingh-Mahabir
    • United Kingdom
    • Privy Council
    • Invalid date
    ... ... 1301C–D, 1303A–C, D, F) ... In re General Rolling Stock Co., Chapman's Case (1866) L.R. 1 Eq. 346 and ... ...
  • Heeralall v Hack Bros. (Construction) Company Ltd et Al
    • Guyana
    • Court of Appeal (Guyana)
    • 28 July 1977
    ...Jackson & Motor Transport Ltd et al, (1966) Supreme Court, No. 557, Demerara, dated 21st May, 1966, that was cited in argument before us. Chapman's case was one I tried at first instance some years pose ago. Among the injuries suffered by the plaintiff was a fracture of the left clavicle an......
  • Get Started for Free
2 firm's commentaries
  • What Do You Get For The Plaintiff Who Has Everything? Maybe A Class Action, Ruled The Seventh Circuit
    • United States
    • Mondaq United States
    • 12 August 2015
    ...Knox v. Service Employees International Union, 132 S. Ct. 2277, 2287 (2012). "Many other decisions say the same thing. By that standard, Chapman's case is not moot. The district court could award damages and enter an injunction. Chapman began this suit seeking those remedies; he does not ha......
  • Three Point Shot - Summer 2014
    • United States
    • Mondaq United States
    • 15 September 2014
    ...Cuban government; in the case of baseball players, this could mean anywhere from a two-year to a lifetime ban from the sport. In Chapman's case, however, his attempted defection allegedly resulted in a meeting with Raul Castro and a seat on the bench during the Cuban national series and the......
2 books & journal articles
  • 2. The Evolution of Statutory Priorities
    • United Kingdom
    • Taylor and Francis Statutory priorities in corporate insolvency law
    • Invalid date
    ...367, 369. 43 Madrid Bank v Pelly (1869) LR 7 Eq 442. 44 Ibid. 449. 45 Ibid. 46 Re General Rolling Stock Company (Chapmans Case) (1866) LR 1 Eq 346, 347. 47 48 Re Coburg and Peterborough Railway Company (1869) 16 Gr 571. 49 Re North Yorkshire Iron Company (1878) 7 Ch D 661. 50 Companies Act ......
  • Table of Cases
    • United Kingdom
    • Taylor and Francis Statutory priorities in corporate insolvency law
    • Invalid date
    ...v Horscroft (1966) 1 WLR 125 Re Galaxy Media Pty Ltd (in liq) (2002) 20 ACLC 73 Re General Rolling Stock Company (Chapmans case) (1866) LR 1 Eq 346 Re Glynconwg Colliery Company Ltd [1926] 1 Ch 951 Green v Giljohann (1995) 17 ACSR 518 Griffiths v Secretary of State for Social Services [1974......