Re Gestetner Settlement. Barnett v Blumka
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Court | Chancery Division |
| Date | 1953 |
| Year | 1953 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
32 cases
- Re Gresham's Settlement ; Lloyds Bank Ltd v Gresham
- Re Chionh Ke Hu, deceased
-
Fawcett Properties Ltd v Buckingham County Council
...Ch. 20. So far as cases of these kinds have any bearing at all on the present case it seems to me that In re Gestetner Settlement. Barnett and Others v. Blumka and Others [1953] 1 Ch. 672 is nearer in point. In that case it was held—I quote from the headnote—that "where a power does not imp......
- Re Wootton, decd
Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
-
English fiduciary standards and trust law.
...17. (111.) Id. at 25-26 (taking account of valid special powers to benefit exceptionally wide classes (citing In re Gestetner Settlement, [1953] Ch. 672; In re Gulbenkian's Settlement, [1970] App. Cas. 508, 524-25 (Lord Upjohn)). On the weak position of objects of powers, see also McPhail, ......
