Re Gestetner Settlement. Barnett v Blumka
Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
Date | 1953 |
Court | Chancery Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
26 cases
- Re Gresham's Settlement ; Lloyds Bank Ltd v Gresham
- Re Chionh Ke Hu, deceased
-
Fawcett Properties Ltd v Buckingham County Council
...1 Ch. 20. So far as cases of these kinds have any bearing at all on the present case it seems to me that In re Gestetner Settlement. Barnett and Others v. Blumka and Others [1953] 1 Ch. 672 is nearer in point. In that case it was held—I quote from the headnote—that "where a power does not i......
-
McPhail v Doulton, sub nom Re Baden's Deed Trusts (No 1)
...... never to have been applied to the ordinary case of a family settlement in which there are discretionary trusts expressed to be for the benefit of ... in this respect, and it does indeed seem strange that the Gestetner rule has grown upround large benevolent funds. In the present case the ......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
English fiduciary standards and trust law.
...17. (111.) Id. at 25-26 (taking account of valid special powers to benefit exceptionally wide classes (citing In re Gestetner Settlement, [1953] Ch. 672; In re Gulbenkian's Settlement, [1970] App. Cas. 508, 524-25 (Lord Upjohn)). On the weak position of objects of powers, see also McPhail, ......