Re H (Restraint Order: Realisable Property)
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1996 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Civil Division) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
35 cases
-
R v Blatch and Seagar
...corporate veil in both cases and treat the turnover of the companies as being to the “benefit” of the appellants: see Re H and others [1996] 2 All ER 391. (iii) But for the acts of the disqualified director in each case, the companies would not have obtained the turnover that they did. (iv)......
-
Windsor v Crown Prosecution Service
...the goods and condemn them. 106 In answer to this, Mr Stancombe relied on Re H and others, (the only report of which we have is at [1996] 2 All ER 391), where the Court of Appeal Civil Division upheld a restraint order on a company having concluded that the defendant had used the corporate......
- Mackt Logistics (M) Sdn Bhd v Malaysian Airline System Berhad
-
Boyle Transport (Northern Ireland) Ltd v R
...that are separate from its shareholders: Salomon v A Salomon & Co Ltd [1897] AC 22; referred to by Rose LJ in Re H and others (restraint order: realisable property): [1996] 2 All ER 391at 401F. A court can "pierce" the carapace of the corporate entity and look at what lies behind it only i......
Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
-
THE NEW ERA OF CORPORATE VEIL-PIERCING
...Blatch[2010] 1 WLR 815 at [76]. 105R v Sale[2014] 1 WLR 663 at [42]. 106Jennings v Crown Prosecution Service[2008] AC 1046 at [3]. 107[1996] 2 All ER 391. 108In re H[1996] 2 All ER 391 at 511–512. 109[2002] EWCA Civ 1720. 110Crown Prosecution Service v Compton[2002] EWCA Civ 1720 at [48]. 1......
-
Knowledge Management in the Proceeds of Crime Community
...M. E. and Talbot, K. V. (1997) 'Confiscation and the Proceeds of Crime', Sweet and Maxwell, London. (10) For example, Re H and Others [1996] 2 All ER 391; Re Andrews [1999] 2 All ER 751; Re Piper [1999] 4 All ER 473; and Foxley v United Kingdom, Application no. 33274/96 to the European Cour......