Re Hagger. Freeman v Arscott

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtChancery Division
Date1930
Year1930

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
9 cases
  • Thomas and Agnes Carvel Foundation v Carvel and another
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 11 Junio 2007
    ... ... 24 In Re Hagger [1930] 2 Ch 190 Clauson J amplified the principle: “To my mind Dufour v ... ...
  • Barns v Barns
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 7 Marzo 2003
    ...seems to have been the view taken by Lord Camden in Dufour v Pereira (1769) 1 Dick 419 [ 21 ER 332] and by Clauson J in In re Hagger [1930] 2 Ch 190. See also Mitchell, ‘Some Aspects of Mutual Wills’, (1951) 14 Modern Law Review 136 and Everton, ‘Betrayal of Faith and Prejudicial Reliance’,......
  • Re Goodchild (Deceased) and Another
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 2 Mayo 1997
    ... ... He referred also to In re Gardner [1920] 2 Ch. 523 and to In re Hagger [1930] 2 Ch. 190 for the proposition that a common intention of husband and wife and taking of ... ...
  • DANTHIKA LAKSHAMANI ABEYWARDENA WICKRAMASINGHE VS. HETTIARACHCHIGE SUNNY DE ALWIS - HON. A. H. M. D. NAWAZ, J
    • Sri Lanka
    • Court of Appeal (Sri Lanka)
    • 2 Septiembre 2016
    ...Laws of England discusses mutual wills. _____________________________ 1Re Piazzi-Smyth [1898] P 7; Re Hagger, Freeman v Arscott [1930] 2 Ch 190; Re Hack (1930) 169 LT Jo 285; Re O'Connar [1942] 1 All ER 546. In Re Stracey (1855) Dea & Sw 6, a joint will made by husband and wife operated as ......
  • Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
  • Wills
    • Jamaica
    • Non-Contentious Probate Practice in the English Speaking Caribbean
    • 21 Septiembre 2013
    ...of the common property. 7 Stone v. Hoskins [1905] P.194. 8 Ibid. 9 Dufour v. Pereira (1769) 1 Dick 419, Re Hagger, Freeman v. Arscott [1930] 2 Ch. 190. Note the decisionin Fereira v. Cabral [1923-24] LR.B.G. 17 where it was held that the children of the beneficiaries of the mutual will, hav......