Re Hain's Settlement

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
JudgeTHE MASTER OF THE ROLLS,LORD JUSTICE UPJOHN,LORD JUSTICE PEARSON
Judgment Date09 February 1961
Neutral Citation[1961] EWCA Civ J0209-5
CourtCourt of Appeal
Date09 February 1961
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
9 cases
  • McPhail v Doulton, sub nom Re Baden's Deed Trusts (No 1)
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 5 February 1969
    ...the judge in the end tocome to the conclusion that this was in effect a power and not a trust. 14 I observe that in ( Re Hain 1961 1 Weekly Law Reports 440) Lord Evershed, Master of the Rolls, did not feel that the fact that the primary trust was expressed in a mandatory form was, on the co......
  • McPhail v Doulton, sub nom Re Baden's Deed Trusts (No 1)
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 6 May 1970
    ...8There is no doubt that the primary trust here is expressed in a mandatory form. True that this is not necessarily conclusive, cf. In re Hain's Settlement [1961] 1 W.L.R. 440 per Lord Evershed M.R. at page 443, but it is powerful foundation for the argument that a trust so created in its i......
  • Whishaw and Another v Stephens and Others
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 31 October 1968
    ...in detail because I think that the present position of the law is far from satisfactory. I agree with criticism by Lord Evershed in Re Hain [1961] 1 W.L.R. 440. by Sachs L.J. in Darwen v. Leek [1968] 2 W.L.R. 1385 and by Lord Denning M.R. in the present case. This case can be decided on the......
  • Re Edmondson's Will Trusts
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • Invalid date
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT