Re Hampshire Land Company
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1896 |
| Court | Chancery Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
176 cases
-
Safeway Stores Ltd and Others v Twigger and Others
...principal and which have, in fact, resulted in harm to his principal. The judge relied on this principle, which takes its name from In Re Hampshire Land Co [1896] 2 Ch. 743, to hold that the maxim ex turpi causa was arguably inapplicable in this case since the acts of the defendants were i......
-
Orr v Milton Keynes Council
...its left hand did not know what its right hand was doing. Nor, with respect, am I able to agree that the 19 th-century doctrine of In re Hampshire Land [1896] Ch 743 which protects employees from the equivalent of a duty of self-incrimination has any bearing on the present branch of modern ......
-
Stone and Rolls Ltd ((in Liquidation)) v Moore Stephens (A Firm)
...relies (i) on a principle of the law of agency known as the Hampshire Land principle after the decision in In re Hampshire Land Company [1896] 2 Ch 743, and (ii) on the principles governing the attribution of actions and states of mind to companies identified in the speech of Lord Hoffmann......
-
HM Revenue and Customs v Greener Solutions Ltd
...EWCA Civ 693; [2005] 2 BCLC 328 Belmont Finance Corp Ltd v Williams Furniture Ltd ELR[1979] 1 Ch 250 Hampshire Land Co, Re ELR[1896] 2 Ch 743 JC Houghton & Co v Nothard Lowe & Wills Ltd ELR[1928] AC 1 Kittel v Belgium; Belgium v Recolta Recycling SPRL ECASECASVAT(Joined Cases C-439/04 and C......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
-
Directors, Officers and Employees not Liable for Penalties Imposed by OFT investigation
...under the Enterprise Act 2002 which can only be committed by an individual). Safeway also argued that the principle in Re Hampshire Land [1896] 2 Ch 743 meant that the maxim ex turpi causa was arguably inapplicable in this case since the acts of the defendants were, for the purposes of this......
6 books & journal articles
-
Tort Law
...at the edge of a precipice at the bottom of which are glass houses. 1 [2016] 2 SLR 940. 2 [2016] 2 SLR 597. 3 Re Hampshire Land Co [1896] 2 Ch 743. 4 [1896] 2 Ch 743. 5 Re Hampshire Land Co [1896] 2 Ch 743 at 749. 6 See Bilta (UK) Ltd v Nazir [2015] 2 All ER 1083. 7 See Ho Kang Peng v Scint......
-
The Insurance Act 2015: Rebalancing the Interests of Insurer and Assured
...The Nancy n 31 above).45 Mahli vAbbey Life Assurance Co Ltd [1996] LRLR 237.46 Report 353, n 10 above at [10.26] and [10.50] et seq.47 [1896] 2 Ch 743.48 Moore Stephens vStone & Rolls Ltd [2009] 1 AC 1391. But see Jetivia SA vBilta (UK) Ltd [2015]UKSC 23, casting doubt on other aspects of t......
-
CONCEPTUAL CONFUSION
...“Foreword” in Corporate Criminal Liability (A Pinto & M Evans) (London: Sweet & Maxwell, 2003) at p xv. 103In re Hampshire Land CoELR[1896] 2 Ch 743. 104Stone & Rolls Ltd v Moore StephensELR[2009] 1 AC 1391 at [88] (HL). 105Stone & Rolls Ltd v Moore StephensELR[2009] 1 AC 1391 at [20] (HL).......
-
Attribution in Company Law
...and Companies’(2013) 13 Journal of Corporate Law Studies 477.2 This principle is derived from the case of In re Hampshire Land Company [1896] 2 Ch 743 (HampshireLand). For criticisms of the Hampshire Land principle, see P. G. Watts (ed), Bowstead & Reynoldson Agency (London: Sweet & Maxwell......
Request a trial to view additional results