Re Hobourn Aero Components Ltd's Air Raid Distress Fund. Ryan v Forrest

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1946
Year1946
CourtCourt of Appeal

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
13 cases
  • Oppenheim v Tobacco Securities Trust Company Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 13 December 1950
    ...and he held that, having regard to the decisions of the Court of Appeal in In re Compton [1945], 1 Ch. 123 and In re Hobourn Aero Components Limited's Air Raid Distress Fund [1946], Ch. 194, he was bound to declare the trust void except as to the property in Scotland and on the 10th Februa......
  • Tito v Waddell (No. 2); Tito v Attorney General; Ocean Island (No. 2)
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • Invalid date
    ...transaction Cunnack v. Edwards [1896] 2 Ch. 679, C.A.Hobourn Aero Components Ltd.'s Air Raid Distress Fund, In re [1946] Ch. 194; [1946] 1 All E.R. 501, C.A. 3. Results of a fiduciary position (1) Conflict of interest and duty Cuckmere Brick Co. Ltd. v. Mutual Finance Ltd. [1971] Ch. 949; [......
  • Dingle v Turner
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 16 February 1972
    ...by analogy to cover such a trust as that with which the Court was concerned. 27Next year in the Hobourn Aero Components Ltd. case [1946] Ch. 194 the Court of Appeal consisting of Greene M.R. and Morton and Somervell L.JJ., had to consider the character of a fund built up by agreed deduction......
  • Equity Trust (Jersey) Ltd v Halabi (in his capacity as Executor of the Estate of the late Madam Intisar Nouri)
    • United Kingdom
    • Privy Council
    • 13 October 2022
    ...In re British Red Cross Balkan Fund [1914] 2 Ch 419, and In re Hobourn Aero Components Ltd's Air Raid Distress Fund [1946] Ch 86 and [1946] Ch 194. Pari passu distribution was famously ordered in relation to that part of the remaining funds of an ultra vires banking business into which n......
  • Get Started for Free
2 books & journal articles
  • Table of Cases
    • United Kingdom
    • Wildy Simmonds & Hill Dissenting Judgments in the Law Preliminary Sections
    • 28 August 2018
    ...Hazell v Hazell [1972] 1 WLR 301, [1972] 1 All ER 923, (1971) 116 SJ 142, CA 223 Hobourn Aero Components Ltd’s Air Raid Distress Fund, Re [1946] Ch 194, [1946] 1 All ER 501, 174 LT 428, 62 TLR 313, [1946] WN 65, CA 201, 207 Holder v Holder [1968] Ch 353, [1968] 2 WLR 237, [1968] 1 All ER 66......
  • Discounting Fiscal Privilege - A More Charitable Solution to the Public Benefit Question Lord MacDermott's Dissent in Oppenheim v Tobacco Securities Trust Co Ltd [1951] AC 297
    • United Kingdom
    • Wildy Simmonds & Hill Dissenting Judgments in the Law Part III - Equity and Property Law
    • 28 August 2018
    ...asserted his agreement with the affirmation of that decision by Morton LJ in In re Hobourn Aero Components Ltd’s Air Raid Distress Fund [1946] Ch 194 30 Above, n 7, at pp 129 –130. Lord Greene MR cited as an example of a case which contained a purely personal qualification, In re Drummond [......