Re Home Treat

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtChancery Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
20 cases
  • : Powertrain Ltd ((in Liquidation))
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • 2 November 2015
    ...of s.1157. In that connection, I was referred to the decision of Parker J in Re X Co Ltd [1907] 2 Ch 92; to the decision of Harman J in Re Home Treat Ltd [1991] BCC 165; and to passages in McPherson's Law of Company Liquidation, at page 444, and the Law of Administrators and Receivers of Co......
  • Powertrain Ltd ((in Liquidation))
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 2 November 2015
    ...of s.1157. In that connection, I was referred to the decision of Parker J in Re X Co Ltd [1907] 2 Ch 92; to the decision of Harman J in Re Home Treat Ltd [1991] BCC 165; and to passages in McPherson's Law of Company Liquidation, at page 444, and the Law of Administrators and Receivers of Co......
  • Re BW Estates Ltd (No 2); Randhawa and Another v Turpin and Another (No 2)
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 1 August 2017
    ...disqualified. Moreover, the conduct that might be taken as having amended the Articles was not unambiguous as would be required (see Re Home Treat Ltd [1991] BCC 165 at page 167). iii) The judge was wrong to find that the appointment of the Joint Administrators was made with the full consen......
  • Inderjit Singh Bhullar v Jatinderjit Singh Bhullar and Others
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 2 March 2017
    ...of fiduciary or statutory duty. ( Boardman v Phipps [1967] 2 A.C. 46 followed; Re Duomatic Ltd [1969] 2 Ch. 365, Re Home Treat Ltd [1991] B.C.C. 165 and Knight v Frost [1999] B.C.C. 819 applied.)" 95 Mr Chaisty and Mr Grantham also noted that the principle in Re Duomatic applies to bot......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
  • The Continuing Value of Relief for Directors' Breach of Duty
    • United Kingdom
    • The Modern Law Review Nbr. 66-2, March 2003
    • 1 March 2003
    ...197. See further, Gore-Browne on Companies, n 3 above, para 27.21.6 The current provision also applies to liquidators: Re Home Treat [1991] BCC 165.7 See Final Report, n 4 above, para 6.3 read with para 6.4. For a statement of the proposedstatutory duties, see White Paper II, n 4 above, Sch......
  • Virtual shareholder meetings: who decides how companies make decisions?
    • Australia
    • Melbourne University Law Review Vol. 28 Nbr. 2, August 2004
    • 1 August 2004
    ...(86) Ibid 1459. (87) Re Pearce Duff & Co Ltd [1960] 1 WLR 1014; Re Oxted Motor Co [1921] 3 KB 32. (88) See, eg, Re Home Treat Ltd [1991] BCLC 705. (89) [1985] 1 WLR 1305, (90) As explained by Harman J in Re Home Treat [1991] BCC 165, 168 (emphasis added): 'Nourse J expressly decided tha......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT