Re Hydrosan Ltd
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1991 |
| Year | 1991 |
| Court | Chancery Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
40 cases
-
Re Freerider Ltd
...v. Westbourne Galleries Ltd., [1973] A.C. 360; [1972] 2 W.L.R. 1289; [1972] 2 All E.R. 492, considered. (11) Hydrosan Ltd., In re, [1991] BCC 19; [1991] BCLC 418, dicta of Harman J. applied. (12) Milgate Devs., In re, [1991] BCC 24; [1993] BCLC 291, followed. (13) Pickering v. StephensonELR......
-
Arrow Trading and Investments Est 1920 and another v Edwardian Group Ltd and Others
...to the company about its affairs, but not where the advice relates to hostile proceedings between the company and its shareholders: see Re Hydrosan Ltd [1991] BCLC 418 and CAS (Nominees) Ltd & others v. Nottingham Forest Plc & others [2001] 1 All ER 954. The essential distinction is between......
-
Mrs Ashley Judith Dawson-Damer v Taylor Wessing LLP
...against the company) in which it has a common interest: see Woodhouse & Co Ltd v Woodhouse (1914) 30 TLR 559; In re Hydrosan Ltd [1991] BCLC 418, CAS (Nominees) Ltd v Nottingham Forest FC plc [2002] 1 BCLC 613 and Arrow Trading and Investments Est 1920 v Edwardian Group Ltd (No 2) [2005] 1 ......
-
BBGP Managing General Partner Ltd v Babcock & Brown Global Partners
...against the company) in which it has a common interest: see Woodhouse & Co Ltd v Woodhouse (1914) 30 TLR 559, Re Hydrosan Ltd [1991] BCLC 418, CAS Nominees Ltd v Nottingham Forest FC plc [2002] BCLC 613 and Arrow Trading v Edwardian Group [2005] 1BCLC 696. 59 There are two other issues whic......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
-
Access To Company Information And Documents Under The BVI Business Companies Act
...solicitors to the company about its affairs, do not attract privilege and are subject to disclosure to a shareholder (Re Hydrosan Ltd [1991] BCLC 418).The rationale for that rule is that a company's legal advice is indirectly paid for by its shareholders, and therefore it would be wrong for......
1 books & journal articles
-
DISCLOSURE OF THE COMPANY'S PRIVILEGED DOCUMENTS TO SHAREHOLDERS AS AN APPLICATION OF JOINT INTEREST PRIVILEGE
...TLR 559 at 560, per Lush J. 43 Three Rivers District Council v Governor and Company of the Bank of England [2005] 1 AC 610 at [86]. 44 [1991] BCLC 418. 45 Re Hydrosan Ltd [1991] BCLC 418 at 422–423. 46 Sharp v Blank [2015] EWHC 2681 (Ch) at [15]–[18]. 47 Re Hydrosan Ltd [1991] BCLC 418 at 4......