Re Islington Metal & Plating Works Ltd

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date1983
Year1983
Date1983
CourtChancery Division

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
21 cases
  • Commonwealth Re Leahy Petroleum - Retail Pty Ltd v Leahy Petroleum - Retail Pty Ltd
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • Invalid date
  • Re Lehman Brothers International (Europe) ((in Administration)) (No 4)
    • United Kingdom
    • Supreme Court
    • 17 May 2017
    ...32 Ch D 41, 48, per Pearson J, In re Fine Industrial Commodities Ltd [1956] Ch 256, 262, per Vaisey J, and In re Islington Metal & Plating Works Ltd [1984] 1 WLR 14, 23–24, per Harman J, and also in the Court of Appeal in In re Lines Bros Ltd (In Liquidation) [1983] Ch 1, 21, per Brightman ......
  • Re T &N Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 17 November 2006
    ...but not the unliquidated claim in tort. He drew the anomaly to the attention of the Cork Committee. 90 In a subsequent case, Re Islington Metal & Plating Works Ltd [1984] 1 WLR 14, Harman J disagreed with the decision of Vinelott J. He held that, on the relevant provisions, a tort claim cou......
  • Gye v Mcintyre
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • Invalid date
  • Get Started for Free
2 books & journal articles
  • CLAIMS FOR INTEREST IN WINDING UP AND BANKRUPTCY
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 1997, December 1997
    • 1 December 1997
    ...point, at [1984] AC 626. 92 Re Berkeley Securities (Properly) Ltd [1980] 1 WLR 1589 at 1609H. 93 Re Islington Metal & Plating Works Ltd [1984] 1 WLR 14 at 20G—H. 94 Supra, notes 60—77 and the accompanying main text. 95 The predecessor of this provision, s 40(3) of the old Bankruptcy Act, wa......
  • Insolvency Law
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Annual Review No. 2007, December 2007
    • 1 December 2007
    ...judgment for a liquidated sum. However, this was not followed in the subsequent decision of In re Islington Metal & Plating Works Ltd[1984] 1 WLR 14, with which this reviewer agrees. It would certainly have been interesting if the court in MCST Plan No 2677 v Hock Chuan Ann Construction Pte......