Re J (A Minor) (Abduction: Custody Rights)
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 1990 |
| Date | 1990 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Civil Division) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
95 cases
-
Re B (A Child) (Habitual Residence: Inherent Jurisdiction)
...in which they were not habitually resident, those aggrieved by their removal can have no recourse to the 1980 Convention. In In re F (A Minor) (Child Abduction) [1992] 1 FLR 548, 555, Butler-Sloss LJ accepted that for that reason it was important that, where possible, a child should have a......
- Re S (Habitual Residence)
-
Za and Pa v Na
...in the sense of a set of pre-determined rules designed to produce a particular legal result in given circumstances: see J (A Minor) (Abduction: Custody Rights) [1990] 2 AC 562; (2) consistently with this, a child does not automatically take the habitual residence of its parents or custodia......
-
Nessa v Chief Adjudication Officer
...for the first time yesterday. 10 That does not make sense to me. 11 The same view was taken by Lord Brandon of Oakbrook in Re J (a Minor) (Abduction: custody rights) [1990] 2 A.C. 562. Lord Donaldson of Lymington M.R in this court had described it as a very interesting question (p.571). But......
Request a trial to view additional results